Theories of intercultural education - Joseba Arregi, Asier Barandiaran, Dmitrii Enygin, Venera Midova (free ebook reader for ipad txt) 📗

References

Abdallah-pretceille, M. 2006. “interculturalism as a paradigm for Thinking about Diversity.” Intercultural Education 17 (5): 475–483.

Abu-Lughod, i. 1991. “Writing against Culture.” in Recapturing Anthopology: Working in the Present, edited by G. Fox, 137–162. Santa Fe: School of American Research press.

Akkari, A., and p. R. Dasen. 2004. “De l’ethnocentrisme de la pédagogie et ses remèdes.” in Pédagogies et pédagogues du sud, edited by A. J. Akkari and p. R. Dasen, 7–21. paris: L’Harmattan.

Allard, A. C. 2006. “A Bit of a Chameleon Act’: A Case Study of One Teacher’s understanding of Diversity.” European Journal of Teacher Education 29 (3): 319–340.

Allemann-Ghionda, C. 2011. “Orte und Worte der Diversität – gestern und heute.” in Orte der Diversität. Formate, Arrangements und Inszenierungen, edited by C. Allemann-Ghionda, W.-D. Bukow, 15–34. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaft.

Allemann-Ghionda, C., and Deloitte Consulting. 2008. Intercultural Education in Schools. Brussels: European parliament.

Altshuler, L., N. Sussman, and E. Kachur. 2003. “Assessing Changes in intercultural Sensitivity among physician Trainees using the intercultural Development inventory.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations 27: 387–401.

Baldwin, J. R., S. L. Faulkner, M. L. Hecht, and S. L. Lindsley. 2006. Redefining Culture: Perspectives across the Disciplines. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.

Banks, J. A. 2009. The Routledge International Companion to Multicultural Education. New York: Routledge. Banks, J. A., and C. A. McGee Banks, eds. 2004. Handbook of Research on Multicultural Education. 2nd

ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Banting, K., and W. Kymlicka. 2013. “is There Really a Retreat from Multiculturalism policies? New

Evidence from the Multiculturalism policy index.” Comparative European Politics 11 (5): 577–598. Barmeyer, C. 2007. Intercultural management and learning styles. Students and leaders in France, Germany and Quebec [Management interculturel et styles d’apprentissage. Etudiants et dirigeants en France, en

Allemagne et au Québec]. Québec: Les presses de l’université Laval.
Barth, F., ed. 1969. Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference. Bergen,

London: universitetsforlaget, Allen and unwin.
Bauman, Z. 2005. “Education in Liquid Modernity.” Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies

27: 303–317.
Berry, J. W. 1971. “Ecological and Cultural Factors in Spatial perceptual Development.” Canadian Journal

of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement 3: 324–336.
Bourdieu, p. 1966. “The conservative school. Social inequity at school and in culture.” [L’école conservatrice. L’inégalité sociale devant l’école et devant la culture.] Revue Française de Sociologie

7: 325–347.
Brewer, M. B. 1991. “The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time.” Personality

and Social Psychology Bulletin 17: 475–482.
Bruner, J. S. 1996. The Culture of Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard university press.
Camilleri, C. 1989. “Culture and cultural identity: a concept of the field in becoming.” [La culture et

l’identité culturelle: champ notionnel en devenir.] in Shocks of cultures: Concepts and Pratical Stakes of the Intercultural Field.]Chocs de Cultures: Concepts et Enjeux Pratiques de L’interculturel, edited by C. Camilleri and M. Cohen-Emerique, 21–73. paris: L’Harmattan.

Camilleri, C. 1990. “The Conditions of the intercultural,” [Les Conditions de L’interculturel.] Intercultures 9: 11–17.

EuROpEAN JOuRNAL OF TEACHER EDuCATiON 399

Cochran-Smith, M. 1995. “Color Blindness and Basket Making Are Not the Answers: Confronting the Dilemmas of Race, Culture, and Language Diversity in Teacher Education.” American Educational Research Journal 32 (3): 493–522.

Council of Europe. 2003. Declaration by the European Ministers of Education on Intercultural Education in the New European Context. Strasbourg: Standing Conference of European Ministers of Education. Crahay, M. 2000. Can School Be Fair and Efficient? [L'école peut-elle être juste et efficace?] Bruxelles: De

Boeck.
Crisp, R. J., and M. Hewstone. 2007. Multiple Social Categorization: Processes, Models and Applications.

Hove: psychology press.
Cuche, D. 1996. The Notion of Culture in Social Sciences. [ La Notion de culture dans les sciences sociales].

paris: La Découverte.
DeJaeghere, Joan G., et Yi Cao. 2009. « Developing u.S. teachers’ intercultural competence: Does

professional development matter? » international Journal of intercultural Relations 33 (5): 437–47. Demorgon, J. 2005. Critics of the Intercultural: The Horizon of Sociology[Critique de l’interculturel: l’horizon

de la sociologie.]. paris: Economica-Anthropos.
Demorgon, J. 2015. Complexité des cultures et de l’interculturel. Contre les pensées uniques. 5e édition

revue et augmentée. paris: Anthropos.
Dervin, F. 2011. “A plea for Change in Research on intercultural Discourses: A ‘Liquid’ Approach to the

Study of the Acculturation of Chinese Students.” Journal of Multicultural Discourses 6 (1): 37–52. Dietz, G. 2007. “Keyword: Cultural Diversity.” Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 10 (1): 7–30.
Dietz, G. 2009. Multiculturalism, Interculturality and Diversity in Education: An Anthropological Approach.

Münster: Waxmann Verlag.
Edelmann, D. 2007. Pedagogical Professionalism in the Transnational Space. A Qualitative Study of How

Teachers Manage Migration Related Diversity in The Classroom. [Pädagogische Professionalität im transnationalen sozialen Raum. Eine qualitative Studie über den Umgang von Lehrpersonen mit der migrationsbedingten Herterogenität ihrer Schulklassen]. Zürich: LiT.

Edelmann, D. 2009. “Concepts of Cultural Differenz in initial and Continuing Education of Teachers - under Special Consideration of the Situation in Switzerland.” [Konzepte kultureller Differenz in der Aus- und Weiterbildung von Lehrpersonen – unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Situation in der Schweiz]. in Concepts about Cultural Difference [Konzepte kultureller Differenz], edited by A. Moosmüller, 121–136. Münster: Waxmann.

Frame, A. 2013. Communication et interculturalité. Cultures et interactions interpersonnelles. paris: Hermès- Lavoisier.

Gallois, C., T. Ogay, and H. Giles. 2005. “Communication Accommodation Theory: A Look Back and a Look Ahead.” in Theorizing about Intercultural Communication, edited by W. B. Gudykunst, 121–148. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Gogolin, i., and M. Krüger-potratz. 2006. Introduction to Intercultural Pedagogy. [Einführung in die Interkulturelle Pädagogik]. Opladen: Budrich.

Gorski, p. C. 2006. “Complicity with Conservatism: The De‐politicizing of Multicultural and intercultural Education.” Intercultural Education 17 (2): 163–177.

Gorski, p. C. 2009. “What We’re Teaching Teachers: An Analysis of Multicultural Teacher Education Coursework Syllabi.” Teaching and Teacher Education 25: 309–318.

Hachfeld, A., A. Hahn, S. Schroeder, Y. Anders, and M. Kunter. 2015. “Should Teachers Be Colorblind? How Multicultural and Egalitarian Beliefs Differentially Relate to Aspects of Teachers’ professional Competence for Teaching in Diverse Classrooms.” Teaching and Teacher Education 48: 44–55.

Helwig, p. 1967. Characterology. [Charakterologie]. Freiburg: Herder.
Kahn, S. 2010. Differentiated Teaching [Pédagogie différenciée]. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
Kroeber, A. L., and C. K. Kluckhohn. 1952. Culture: A Critical Review of Concept and Definitions. Cambridge,

MA: Harvard university press.
Krüger-potratz, M. 2005. Intercultural Education: An Introduction [ Interkulturelle Bildung: eine Einführung].

Münster: Waxman.
Kymlicka, W. 2012. Multiculturalism: Success, Failure, and the Future. Washington, DC: Migration policy

institute.
Leutwyler, B., E. Steinger, and p. Sieber. 2009. “Thinking about Normality: A phase Model. How

Teachers Differentially Think About Cultural Diversity at School and in Teaching” [Stufenmodell

400 T. OGAY AND D. EDELMANN

der Normalitätsreflexionen. Wie Lehrpersonen kulturelle Heterogenität in Schule und unterricht

unterschiedlich reflektieren]. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Bildungswissenschaften 31 (3): 565–583. Lewis, A. E. 2001. “There is No "Race" in the Schoolyard: Color-Blind ideology in an (Almost) All-White

School.” American Educational Research Journal 38 (4): 781–811.
Lyotard, J.-F. 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis: university of

Minnesota press.
Mahon, J. 2006. “under the invisibility Cloak? Teacher understanding of Cultural Difference.” Intercultural

Education 17 (4): 391–405.
Martin, J. N., and T. K. Nakayama. 1999. “Thinking Dialectically about Culture and Communication.”

Communication Theory 9: 1–25.
Mason, M., ed. 2008. Complexity Theory and the Philosophy of Education. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. Mecheril, p. 2010. “The Order of the Educational Sciences Discourse in the Migration Society” [Die

Ordnung des erziehungswissenschaftlichen Diskurses in der Migrationsgesellschaft]. in Migration Pedagogy [Migrationspädagogik], edited by p. Mecheril, M. Castro do Mar Varela, i. Dirim, A. Kalpaka and C. Melter, 54–76. Weinheim: Beltz.

Morin, E. 1990. Introduction to Complex Thinking [Introduction à La Pensée Complexe]. paris: ESF. OECD. 2010. Educating Teachers for Diversity. Meeting the Challenge. paris: Organisation for Economic

Co-operation and Development.
Ogay, T. 2000. From intercultural Competence to The intercultural Dynamics. intercultural

Communication Theories Tested in The Context of a Youth Exchange program Between French- and German-speaking Switzerland [De la compétence à la dynamique interculturelles. Des théories de la communication interculturelle à l’épreuve d’un échange de jeunes entre Suisse romande et alémanique]. Berne: peter Lang.

Ogay, T., and D. Edelmann. 2011. “Figuring interculturality in professional Training: The unavoidable Dialectics of Difference”[penser l’interculturalité dans la formation des professionnels: l’incontournable dialectique de la différence]. in Anthropologies of Interculturality [Anthropologies de l’interculturalité], edited by A. Lavanchy, F. Dervin and A. Gajardo, 47–71. paris: L’Harmattan.

payet, J.-p., M. Sanchez-Mazas, F.-E. Giuliani, and R. Fernandez. 2011.“Teachers Actions between Control and uncertainties. Towards a Typology of Teachers Stances in Relating with Others” [L’agir scolaire entre régulations et incertitudes. Vers une typologie des postures enseignantes de la relation à autrui]. Education et sociétés 27 (1): 23–37.

portera, A. 2014. “intercultural Competence in Education, Counselling and psychotherapy.” Intercultural Education 25 (2): 157–174.

prengel, A. 2007. “Schools and Transgressive Worlds in Limbo. Approaches for Research and Training” [im Schwebezustand: Schulen und Transgressive Lebenswelten. Ansätze in Forschung und Lehre]. Revue suisse Des Sciences de l’éducation 29 (3): 363–378.

pretceille, M. A. 2012. “What Anthropology for which education?" [Quelle Anthropologie pour Quel Enseignement ?] in Anthropology, Interculturality and Language Learning-Teaching : How Compatible Are The [Anthropologies, Interculturalité et Enseignement-Apprentissage Des Langues: Quelle(S) Compatibilité(S)?] ? edited by F. Dervin and B. Fracchiolla, 19–34. Transversales. Berne: p. Lang.

Rey-von Allmen, M. 2011. “The intercultural perspective and its Development through Cooperation with the Council of Europe.” in Multicultural Education. Enhancing Global Interconnectedness, edited by C. A. Grant and A. portera, 33–48. New York: Routledge.

Sarangi, S. 1994. “intercultural or Not? Beyond Celebration of Cultural Differences in Miscommunication Analysis.” Pragmatics 4 (3): 409–427.

Schulz von Thun, F. 1997. Talking Together 2. Styles, Values and Personal Development [Miteinander Reden 2. Stile, Werte und Persönlichkeitsentwicklung]. Reinbek: Rowohlt.

Segall, M. H., p. R. Dasen, J. W. Berry, and Y. H. poortinga. 1990. Human Behavior in Global Perspective. an Introduction to Cross-Cultural Psychology. New York: pergamon press.

Segall, M. H., W. J. Lonner, and J. W. Berry. 1998. “Cross-Cultural psychology as a Scholarly Discipline: On the Flowering of Culture in Behavioral Research.” American Psychologist 53 (10): 1101–1110.

Ting-Toomey, S. 1999. Communicating across Cultures. New York: Guilford.
uNESCO. 2006. UNESCO Guidelines on Intercultural Education. paris: uNESCO.
Wagener, A. 2014.“The concept of culture: an absolute necessity in humanities?”[Le concept de culture:

une nécessité absolue en sciences humaines?]. Signes, Discours et sociétés no. 12 (1). http://www. revue-signes.info/document.php?id=3294. iSSN 1308-8378.

1 Introduction

There is general agreement that intercultural competence, which has been especially developed in language training, is becoming more and more necessary for citizens today, as they encounter colleagues, clients or friends, at home or abroad, during work or leisure. This competence is based on a deep sensitive understanding of the other person and on communicative capacities. One would not expect eLearning to offer the required environment for developing such interpersonal capacities. However, it will be argued here that developing intercultural awareness in learners can be facilitated by elearning environments. Furthermore, as pedagogical practices, previously based mainly on paper technology, gradually integrate digital technology, a much more important goal can be attained with teachers: a renewed understanding of the cultural embeddedness of learning and teaching. This can lead to an urgently needed empowerment of educational actors who are confronted with specific new cultural challenges that the use of digital technology and knowledge is generating today.

eLearning Papers • www.elearningpapers.eu • 1 No 7 • February 2008 • ISSN 1887-1542

2 Acquiring intercultural competence through elearning

Learners and teachers have to cope more and more with the crucial issue of cultural heterogeneity. School and university populations are increasingly multicultural, as people migrate for professional, social or political reasons. The globalisation of the economy is bringing together people of different hemispheres, cultures, civilisations, people that need to speak to each other and to understand one other. One important answer to this cultural diversity has been the generalisation of multilinguism in European schools. Training students in a second and in a third language has brought about a maturing of sociocultural educational goals, strategies and methods in language education and the development of specific elearning resources for cultural competences. It is therefore important to begin this reflection by framing the notion of students’ “intercultural competence”, in reference to the substantial educational work already accomplished.

All across Europe, schools and universities have been setting up new training contents and methods in order to develop in students’ intercultural skills and competence. Otto Lüdemann retraces how the intercultural dimension has been present from the very beginning in European Commission initiatives and programmes such as Erasmus (1987), Lingua (1990), Jean-Monnet Action (1990), or Socrates (1995). Research and pedagogical practices had focused on knowledge of culture and language fluency but have now come to integrate intercultural relations and communications.

Learning goals have been transformed along the way. Byram, an important actor in European language education policy, wrote