Essays On Education And Kindred Subjects (Fiscle Part- 11) - Herbert Spencer (if you give a mouse a cookie read aloud txt) 📗
- Author: Herbert Spencer
Book online «Essays On Education And Kindred Subjects (Fiscle Part- 11) - Herbert Spencer (if you give a mouse a cookie read aloud txt) 📗». Author Herbert Spencer
Expiration Of A Thousand Years, They Had Advanced To Their "Great
System" Of The Double Octave. Through All Which Changes There Of Course
Arose A Greater Heterogeneity Of Melody. Simultaneously There Came Into
Use The Different Modes--Dorian, Ionian, Phrygian, Æolian, And
Lydian--Answering To Our Keys; And Of These There Were Ultimately
Fifteen. As Yet, However, There Was But Little Heterogeneity In The Time
Of Their Music.
Instrumental Music During This Period Being Merely The Accompaniment Of
Vocal Music, And Vocal Music Being Completely Subordinated To Words, The
Singer Being Also The Poet, Chanting His Own Compositions And Making The
Lengths Of His Notes Agree With The Feet Of His Verses,--There
Unavoidably Arose A Tiresome Uniformity Of Measure, Which, As Dr. Burney
Says, "No Resources Of Melody Could Disguise." Lacking The Complex
Rhythm Obtained By Our Equal Bars And Unequal Notes The Only Rhythm Was
That Produced By The Quantity Of The Syllables And Was Of Necessity
Comparatively Monotonous. And Further, It May Be Observed That The Chant
Thus Resulting, Being Like Recitative, Was Much Less Clearly
Differentiated From Ordinary Speech Than Is Our Modern Song.
Part 2 Chapter 1 (Progress Its Law And Cause) Pg 71
Nevertheless, In Virtue Of The Extended Range Of Notes In Use, The
Variety Of Modes, The Occasional Variations Of Time Consequent On
Changes Of Metre, And The Multiplication Of Instruments, Music Had,
Towards The Close Of Greek Civilisation, Attained To Considerable
Heterogeneity--Not Indeed As Compared With Our Music, But As Compared
With That Which Preceded It. As Yet, However, There Existed Nothing But
Melody: Harmony Was Unknown. It Was Not Until Christian Church-Music Had
Reached Some Development, That Music In Parts Was Evolved; And Then It
Came Into Existence Through A Very Unobtrusive Differentiation.
Difficult As It May Be To Conceive _À Priori_ How The Advance From
Melody To Harmony Could Take Place Without A Sudden Leap, It Is None The
Less True That It Did So. The Circumstance Which Prepared The Way For It
Was The Employment Of Two Choirs Singing Alternately The Same Air.
Afterwards It Became The Practice--Very Possibly First Suggested By A
Mistake--For The Second Choir To Commence Before The First Had Ceased;
Thus Producing A Fugue.
With The Simple Airs Then In Use, A Partially Harmonious Fugue Might Not
Improbably Thus Result: And A Very Partially Harmonious Fugue Satisfied
The Ears Of That Age, As We Know From Still Preserved Examples. The Idea
Having Once Been Given, The Composing Of Airs Productive Of Fugal
Harmony Would Naturally Grow Up; As In Some Way It _Did_ Grow Up Out Of
This Alternate Choir-Singing. And From The Fugue To Concerted Music Of
Two, Three, Four, And More Parts, The Transition Was Easy. Without
Pointing Out In Detail The Increasing Complexity That Resulted From
Introducing Notes Of Various Lengths, From The Multiplication Of Keys,
From The Use Of Accidentals, From Varieties Of Time, And So Forth, It
Needs But To Contrast Music As It Is, With Music As It Was, To See How
Immense Is The Increase Of Heterogeneity. We See This If, Looking At
Music In Its _Ensemble_, We Enumerate Its Many Different Genera And
Species--If We Consider The Divisions Into Vocal, Instrumental, And
Mixed; And Their Subdivisions Into Music For Different Voices And
Different Instruments--If We Observe The Many Forms Of Sacred Music,
From The Simple Hymn, The Chant, The Canon, Motet, Anthem, Etc., Up To
The Oratorio; And The Still More Numerous Forms Of Secular Music, From
The Ballad Up To The Serenata, From The Instrumental Solo Up To The
Symphony.
Again, The Same Truth Is Seen On Comparing Any One Sample Of Aboriginal
Music With A Sample Of Modern Music--Even An Ordinary Song For The
Piano; Which We Find To Be Relatively Highly Heterogeneous, Not Only In
Respect Of The Varieties In The Pitch And In The Length Of The Notes,
The Number Of Different Notes Sounding At The Same Instant In Company
With The Voice, And The Variations Of Strength With Which They Are
Sounded And Sung, But In Respect Of The Changes Of Key, The Changes Of
Time, The Changes Of _Timbre_ Of The Voice, And The Many Other
Modifications Of Expression. While Between The Old Monotonous
Dance-Chant And A Grand Opera Of Our Own Day, With Its Endless
Orchestral Complexities And Vocal Combinations, The Contrast In
Heterogeneity Is So Extreme That It Seems Scarcely Credible That The One
Should Have Been The Ancestor Of The Other.
Were They Needed, Many Further Illustrations Might Be Cited. Going Back
To The Early Time When The Deeds Of The God-King, Chanted And
Mimetically Represented In Dances Round His Altar, Were Further Narrated
In Picture-Writings On The Walls Of Temples And Palaces, And So
Constituted A Rude Literature, We Might Trace The Development Of
Literature Through Phases In Which, As In The Hebrew Scriptures, It
Presents In One Work Theology, Cosmogony, History, Biography, Civil Law,
Ethics, Poetry; Through Other Phases In Which, As In The Iliad, The
Religious, Martial, Historical, The Epic, Dramatic, And Lyric Elements
Are Similarly Commingled; Down To Its Present Heterogeneous Development,
In Which Its Divisions And Subdivisions Are So Numerous And Varied As To
Defy Complete Classification. Or We Might Trace Out The Evolution Of
Science; Beginning With The Era In Which It Was Not Yet Differentiated
From Art, And Was, In Union With Art, The Handmaid Of Religion; Passing
Through The Era In Which The Sciences Were So Few And Rudimentary, As To
Be Simultaneously Cultivated By The Same Philosophers; And Ending With
The Era In Which The Genera And Species Are So Numerous That Few Can
Enumerate Them, And No One Can Adequately Grasp Even One Genus. Or We
Might Do The Like With Architecture, With The Drama, With Dress.
But Doubtless The Reader Is Already Weary Of Illustrations; And Our
Promise Has Been Amply Fulfilled. We Believe We Have Shown Beyond
Question, That That Which The German Physiologists Have Found To Be The
Law Of Organic Development, Is The Law Of All Development. The Advance
From The Simple To The Complex, Through A Process Of Successive
Differentiations, Is Seen Alike In The Earliest Changes Of The Universe
To Which We Can Reason Our Way Back; And In The Earliest Changes Which
We Can Inductively Establish; It Is Seen In The Geologic And Climatic
Evolution Of The Earth, And Of Every Single Organism On Its Surface; It
Is Seen In The Evolution Of Humanity, Whether Contemplated In The
Civilised Individual, Or In The Aggregation Of Races; It Is Seen In The
Evolution Of Society In Respect Alike Of Its Political, Its Religious,
And Its Economical Organisation; And It Is Seen In The Evolution Of All
Those Endless Concrete And Abstract Products Of Human Activity Which
Constitute The Environment Of Our Daily Life. From The Remotest Past
Which Science Can Fathom, Up To The Novelties Of Yesterday, That In
Which Progress Essentially Consists, Is The Transformation Of The
Homogeneous Into The Heterogeneous.
And Now, From This Uniformity Of Procedure, May We Not Infer Some
Fundamental Necessity Whence It Results? May We Not Rationally Seek For
Some All-Pervading Principle Which Determines This All-Pervading Process
Of Things? Does Not The Universality Of The _Law_ Imply A Universal
_Cause_?
That We Can Fathom Such Cause, Noumenally Considered, Is Not To Be
Supposed. To Do This Would Be To Solve That Ultimate Mystery Which Must
Ever Transcend Human Intelligence. But It Still May Be Possible For Us
To Reduce The Law Of All Progress, Above Established, From The Condition
Of An Empirical Generalisation, To The Condition Of A Rational
Generalisation. Just As It Was Possible To Interpret Kepler's Laws As
Necessary Consequences Of The Law Of Gravitation; So It May Be Possible
To Interpret This Law Of Progress, In Its Multiform Manifestations, As
The Necessary Consequence Of Some Similarly Universal Principle. As
Part 2 Chapter 1 (Progress Its Law And Cause) Pg 72Gravitation Was Assignable As The _Cause_ Of Each Of The Groups Of
Phenomena Which Kepler Formulated; So May Some Equally Simple Attribute
Of Things Be Assignable As The Cause Of Each Of The Groups Of Phenomena
Formulated In The Foregoing Pages. We May Be Able To Affiliate All These
Varied And Complex Evolutions Of The Homogeneous Into The Heterogeneous,
Upon Certain Simple Facts Of Immediate Experience, Which, In Virtue Of
Endless Repetition, We Regard As Necessary.
The Probability Of A Common Cause, And The Possibility Of Formulating
It, Being Granted, It Will Be Well, Before Going Further, To Consider
What Must Be The General Characteristics Of Such Cause, And In What
Direction We Ought To Look For It. We Can With Certainty Predict That It
Has A High Degree Of Generality; Seeing That It Is Common To Such
Infinitely Varied Phenomena: Just In Proportion To The Universality Of
Its Application Must Be The Abstractness Of Its Character. We Need Not
Expect To See In It An Obvious Solution Of This Or That Form Of
Progress; Because It Equally Refers To Forms Of Progress Bearing Little
Apparent Resemblance To Them: Its Association With Multiform Orders Of
Facts, Involves Its Dissociation From Any Particular Order Of Facts.
Being That Which Determines Progress Of Every Kind--Astronomic,
Geologic, Organic, Ethnologic, Social, Economic, Artistic, Etc.--It Must
Be Concerned With Some Fundamental Attribute Possessed In Common By
These; And Must Be Expressible In Terms Of This Fundamental Attribute.
The Only Obvious Respect In Which All Kinds Of Progress Are Alike, Is,
That They Are Modes Of _Change_; And Hence, In Some Characteristic Of
Changes In General, The Desired Solution Will Probably Be Found. We May
Suspect _À Priori_ That In Some Law Of Change Lies The Explanation Of
This Universal Transformation Of The Homogeneous Into The Heterogeneous.
Thus Much Premised, We Pass At Once To The Statement Of The Law, Which
Is This:--_Every Active Force Produces More Than One Change_--_Every
Cause Produces More Than One Effect_.
Before This Law Can Be Duly Comprehended, A Few Examples Must Be Looked
At. When One Body Is Struck Against Another, That Which We Usually
Regard As The Effect, Is A Change Of Position Or Motion In One Or Both
Bodies. But A Moment's Thought Shows Us That This Is A Careless And Very
Incomplete View Of The Matter. Besides The Visible Mechanical Result,
Sound Is Produced; Or, To Speak Accurately, A Vibration In One Or Both
Bodies, And In The Surrounding Air: And Under Some Circumstances We Call
This The Effect. Moreover, The Air Has Not Only Been Made To Vibrate,
But Has Had Sundry Currents Caused In It By The Transit Of The Bodies.
Further, There Is A Disarrangement Of The Particles Of The Two Bodies In
The Neighbourhood Of Their Point Of Collision; Amounting In Some Cases
To A Visible Condensation. Yet More, This Condensation Is Accompanied By
The Disengagement Of Heat. In Some Cases A Spark--That Is,
Light--Results, From The Incandescence Of A Portion Struck Off; And
Sometimes This Incandescence Is Associated With Chemical Combination.
Thus, By The Original Mechanical Force Expended In The Collision, At
Least Five, And Often More, Different Kinds Of Changes Have Been
Produced. Take, Again, The Lighting Of A Candle. Primarily This Is A
Chemical Change Consequent On A Rise Of Temperature. The Process Of
Combination Having Once Been Set Going By Extraneous Heat, There Is A
Continued Formation Of Carbonic Acid, Water, Etc.--In Itself A Result
More Complex Than The Extraneous Heat That First Caused It. But
Accompanying This Process Of Combination There Is A Production Of Heat;
There Is A Production
Comments (0)