Lark Rise - Flora Thompson (read more books .TXT) 📗
- Author: Flora Thompson
- Performer: -
Book online «Lark Rise - Flora Thompson (read more books .TXT) 📗». Author Flora Thompson
scent of his twitch fire smoke would float in at the windows. It was
pleasant, too, in summer twilight, perhaps in hot weather when water was
scarce, to hear the swish of water on parched earth in a garden—water
which had been fetched from the brook a quarter of a mile distant. ‘It’s
no good stintin’ th’ land,’ they would say. ‘If you wants anything out
you’ve got to put summat in, if ‘tis only elbow-grease.’
The allotment plots were divided into two, and one half planted with
potatoes and the other half with wheat or barley. The garden was
reserved for green vegetables, currant and gooseberry bushes, and a few
old-fashioned flowers. Proud as they were of their celery, peas and
beans, cauliflowers and marrows, and fine as were the specimens they
could show of these, their potatoes were their special care, for they
had to grow enough to last the year round. They grew all the
old-fashioned varieties—ashleaf kidney, early rose, American rose,
magnum bonum, and the huge misshaped white elephant. Everybody knew the
elephant was an unsatisfactory potato, that it was awkward to handle
when paring and that it boiled down to a white pulp in cooking; but it
produced tubers of such astonishing size that none of the men could
resist the temptation to plant it. Every year specimens were taken to
the inn to be weighed on the only pair of scales in the hamlet, then
handed round for guesses to be made of the weight. As the men said, when
a patch of elephants was dug up and spread out, ‘You’d got summat to put
in your eye and look at.’
Very little money was spent on seed; there was little to spend, and they
depended mainly upon the seed saved from the previous year. Sometimes,
to secure the advantage of fresh soil, they would exchange a bag of seed
potatoes with friends living at a distance, and sometimes a gardener at
one of the big houses around would give one of them a few tubers of a
new variety. These would be carefully planted and tended, and, when the
crop was dug up, specimens would be presented to neighbours.
Most of the men sang or whistled as they dug or hoed. There was a good
deal of outdoor singing in those days. Workmen sang at their jobs; men
with horses and carts sang on the road; the baker, the miller’s man, and
the fish-hawker sang as they went from door to door; even the doctor and
parson on their rounds hummed a tune between their teeth. People were
poorer and had not the comforts, amusements, or knowledge we have
to-day; but they were happier. Which seems to suggest that happiness
depends more upon the state of mind—and body, perhaps—than upon
circumstances and events.
IVAt the ‘Wagon and Horses’
Fordlow might boast of its church, its school, its annual concert, and
its quarterly penny reading, but the hamlet did not envy it these
amenities, for it had its own social centre, warmer, more human, and
altogether preferable in the taproom of the ‘Wagon and Horses’.
There the adult male population gathered every evening, to sip its
half-pints, drop by drop, to make them last, and to discuss local
events, wrangle over politics or farming methods, or to sing a few songs
‘to oblige’.
It was an innocent gathering. None of them got drunk; they had not money
enough, even with beer, and good beer, at twopence a pint. Yet the
parson preached from the pulpit against it, going so far on one occasion
as to call it a den of iniquity. ”Tis a great pity he can’t come an’
see what it’s like for his own self,’ said one of the older men on the
way home from church. ‘Pity he can’t mind his own business,’ retorted a
younger one. While one of the ancients put in pacifically, ‘Well, ‘tis
his business, come to think on’t. The man’s paid to preach, an’ he’s got
to find summat to preach against, stands to reason.’
Only about half a dozen men held aloof from the circle and those were
either known to ‘have religion’, or suspected of being ‘close wi’ their
ha’pence’.
The others went as a matter of course, appropriating their own special
seats on settle or bench. It was as much their home as their own
cottages, and far more homelike than many of them, with its roaring
fire, red window curtains, and well-scoured pewter.
To spend their evenings there was, indeed, as the men argued, a saving,
for, with no man in the house, the fire at home could be let die down
and the rest of the family could go to bed when the room got cold. So
the men’s spending money was fixed at a shilling a week, sevenpence for
the nightly half-pint and the balance for other expenses. An ounce of
tobacco, Nigger Head brand, was bought for them by their wives with the
groceries.
It was exclusively a men’s gathering. Their wives never accompanied
them; though sometimes a woman who had got her family off hand, and so
had a few halfpence to spend on herself, would knock at the back door
with a bottle or jug and perhaps linger a little, herself unseen, to
listen to what was going on within. Children also knocked at the back
door to buy candles or treacle or cheese, for the innkeeper ran a small
shop at the back of his premises, and the children, too, liked to hear
what was going on. Indoors, the innkeeper’s children would steal out of
bed and sit on the stairs in their nightgowns. The stairs went up from
the taproom, with only the back of the settle between, and it gave the
men a bit of a shock one night when what looked at first sight like a
big white bird came flopping down among them. It was little Florrie, who
had gone to sleep on the stairs and fallen. They nursed her on their
knees, held her feet to the fire, and soon dried her tears, for she was
not hurt, only frightened.
The children heard no bad language beyond an occasional ‘b–-‘ or
‘d–-‘, for their mother was greatly respected and the merest hint of
anything stronger was hushed by nudges and whispers of, ‘Don’t forget
Landlady’, or ‘Mind! ‘Ooman present’. Nor were the smutty songs and
stories of the fields ever repeated there; they were kept for their own
time and place.
Politics was a favourite topic, for, under the recently extended
franchise, every householder was a voter, and they took their new
responsibility seriously. A mild Liberalism prevailed, a Liberalism that
would be regarded as hide-bound Toryism now, but was daring enough in
those days. One man who had been to work in Northampton proclaimed
himself a Radical; but he was cancelled out by the landlord, who called
himself a ‘true blue’. With the collaboration of this Left and Right,
questions of the moment were thrashed out and settled to the
satisfaction of the majority.
‘Three Acres and a Cow’, ‘The Secret Ballot’, ‘The Parnell Commission
and Crime’, ‘Disestablishment of the Church’, were catchwords that flew
about freely. Sometimes a speech by Gladstone, or some other leader
would be read aloud from a newspaper and punctuated by the fervent
‘Hear! Hear’ of the company. Or Sam, the man with advanced opinions,
would relate with reverent pride the story of his meeting and shaking
hands with Joseph Arch, the farm-worker’s champion. ‘Joseph Arch!’ he
would cry. ‘Joseph Arch is the man for the farm labourer!’ and knock on
the table and wave aloft his pewter mug, very carefully, for every drop
was precious.
Then the landlord, standing back to the fireplace with legs astride,
would say with the authority of one in his own house, ‘It’s no good you
chaps think’n you’re goin’ against the gentry. They’ve got the land and
they’ve got the money, an‘ they’ll keep it. Where’d you be without
them to give you work an’ pay your wages, I’d like to know?’ and this,
as yet, unanswerable question would cast a chill over the company until
some one conjured it away with the name of Gladstone. Gladstone! The
Grand Old Man! The People’s William! Their faith in his power was
touching, and all voices would join in singing:
God bless the people’s William,
Long may he lead the van
Of Liberty and Freedom,
God bless the Grand Old Man.
But the children, listening, without and within, liked better the
evenings of tale-telling; when, with curdling blood and creeping spine,
they would hear about the turnpike ghost, which, only a mile away from
the spot where they stood, had been seen in the form of a lighted
lantern, bobbing up and down in the path of a solitary wayfarer, the
bearer, if any, invisible. And the man in a neighbouring village who, on
his six-mile walk in the dark to fetch medicine for his sick wife, met a
huge black dog with eyes of fire—the devil, evidently. Or perhaps the
talk would turn to the old sheep-stealing days and the ghost which was
said still to haunt the spot where the gibbet had stood; or the lady
dressed in white and riding a white horse, but minus her head, who,
every night as the clock struck twelve, rode over a bridge on the way to
the market town.
One cold winter night, as this tale was being told, the doctor, an old
man of eighty, who still attended the sick in the villages for miles
around, stopped his dogcart at the inn gate and came in for hot brandy
and water.
‘You, sir, now,’ said one of the men. ‘You’ve been over Lady Bridge at
midnight many’s the time, I’ll warrant. Can you say as you’ve ever seen
anything?’
The doctor shook his head. ‘No,’ he replied, ‘I can’t say that I have.
But,’ and he paused to weigh his words, ‘well, it’s rather a curious
thing. During the fifty years I’ve been amongst you I’ve had many
horses, as you know, and not one of them have I got over that bridge at
night without urging. Whether they can see more than we can see, of
course, I don’t know; but there it is for what it is worth. Good night,
men.’
In addition to these public and well-known ghost stories, there were
family tales of death warnings, or of a father, mother, or wife who had
appeared after death to warn, counsel, or accuse. But it was all
entertainment; nobody really believed in ghosts, though few would have
chosen to go at night to haunted spots, and it all ended in: ‘Well,
well, if the livin’ don’t hurt us, the dead can’t. The good wouldn’t
want to come back, an’ the bad wouldn’t be let to.’
The newspapers furnished other tales of dread. Jack the Ripper was
stalking the streets of East London by night, and one poor wretched
woman after another was found murdered and butchered. These crimes were
discussed for hours together in the hamlet and everybody had some theory
as to the identity and motive of the elusive murderer. To the children
the name was indeed one of dread and the cause of much anguished
sleeplessness. Father might be hammering away in the shed and Mother
quietly busy with her sewing downstairs; but the Ripper! the Ripper! he
might be nearer still, for he might have crept in during the day and be
hiding in the cupboard on the landing!
One curious tale had to do with natural phenomena. Some years before,
the people in the hamlet had seen a regiment of soldiers marching in the
sky, all
Comments (0)