Colonel Chabert - Honoré de Balzac (free books to read txt) 📗
- Author: Honoré de Balzac
- Performer: -
Book online «Colonel Chabert - Honoré de Balzac (free books to read txt) 📗». Author Honoré de Balzac
Colonel Chabert, whose address was written at the bottom of the first
receipt he had given the notary, was lodging in the Faubourg Saint-Marceau, Rue du Petit-Banquier, with an old quartermaster of the
Imperial Guard, now a cowkeeper, named Vergniaud. Having reached the
spot, Derville was obliged to go on foot in search of his client, for
his coachman declined to drive along an unpaved street, where the ruts
were rather too deep for cab wheels. Looking about him on all sides,
the lawyer at last discovered at the end of the street nearest to the
boulevard, between two walls built of bones and mud, two shabby stone
gate-posts, much knocked about by carts, in spite of two wooden stumps
that served as blocks. These posts supported a cross beam with a
penthouse coping of tiles, and on the beam, in red letters, were the
words, “Vergniaud, dairyman.” To the right of this inscription were
some eggs, to the left a cow, all painted in white. The gate was open,
and no doubt remained open all day. Beyond a good-sized yard there was
a house facing the gate, if indeed the name of house may be applied to
one of the hovels built in the neighborhood of Paris, which are like
nothing else, not even the most wretched dwellings in the country, of
which they have all the poverty without their poetry.
Indeed, in the midst of the fields, even a hovel may have a certain
grace derived from the pure air, the verdure, the open country—a
hill, a serpentine road, vineyards, quickset hedges, moss-grown thatch
and rural implements; but poverty in Paris gains dignity only by
horror. Though recently built, this house seemed ready to fall into
ruins. None of its materials had found a legitimate use; they had been
collected from the various demolitions which are going on every day in
Paris. On a shutter made of the boards of a shop-sign Derville read
the words, “Fancy Goods.” The windows were all mismatched and
grotesquely placed. The ground floor, which seemed to be the habitable
part, was on one side raised above the soil, and on the other sunk in
the rising ground. Between the gate and the house lay a puddle full of
stable litter, into which flowed the rain-water and house waste. The
back wall of this frail construction, which seemed rather more solidly
built than the rest, supported a row of barred hutches, where rabbits
bred their numerous families. To the right of the gate was the
cowhouse, with a loft above for fodder; it communicated with the house
through the dairy. To the left was a poultry yard, with a stable and
pig-styes, the roofs finished, like that of the house, with rough deal
boards nailed so as to overlap, and shabbily thatched with rushes.
Like most of the places where the elements of the huge meal daily
devoured by Paris are every day prepared, the yard Derville now
entered showed traces of the hurry that comes of the necessity for
being ready at a fixed hour. The large pot-bellied tin cans in which
milk is carried, and the little pots for cream, were flung pell-mell
at the dairy door, with their linen-covered stoppers. The rags that
were used to clean them, fluttered in the sunshine, riddled with
holes, hanging to strings fastened to poles. The placid horse, of a
breed known only to milk-women, had gone a few steps from the cart,
and was standing in front of the stable, the door being shut. A goat
was munching the shoots of a starved and dusty vine that clung to the
cracked yellow wall of the house. A cat, squatting on the cream jars,
was licking them over. The fowls, scared by Derville’s approach,
scuttered away screaming, and the watch-dog barked.
“And the man who decided the victory at Eylau is to be found here!”
said Derville to himself, as his eyes took in at a glance the general
effect of the squalid scene.
The house had been left in charge of three little boys. One, who had
climbed to the top of the cart loaded with hay, was pitching stones
into the chimney of a neighboring house, in the hope that they might
fall into a saucepan; another was trying to get a pig into a cart, to
hoist it by making the whole thing tilt. When Derville asked them if
M. Chabert lived there, neither of them replied, but all three looked
at him with a sort of bright stupidity, if I may combine those two
words. Derville repeated his questions, but without success. Provoked
by the saucy cunning of these three imps, he abused them with the sort
of pleasantry which young men think they have the right to address to
little boys, and they broke the silence with a horse-laugh. Then
Derville was angry.
The Colonel, hearing him, now came out of the little low room, close
to the dairy, and stood on the threshold of his doorway with
indescribable military coolness. He had in his mouth a very finely-colored pipe—a technical phrase to a smoker—a humble, short clay
pipe of the kind called “brule-queule.” He lifted the peak of a
dreadfully greasy cloth cap, saw Derville, and came straight across
the midden to join his benefactor the sooner, calling out in friendly
tones to the boys:
“Silence in the ranks!”
The children at once kept a respectful silence, which showed the power
the old soldier had over them.
“Why did you not write to me?” he said to Derville. “Go along by the
cowhouse! There—the path is paved there,” he exclaimed, seeing the
lawyer’s hesitancy, for he did not wish to wet his feet in the manure
heap.
Jumping from one dry spot to another, Derville reached the door by
which the Colonel had come out. Chabert seemed but ill pleased at
having to receive him in the bedroom he occupied; and, in fact,
Derville found but one chair there. The Colonel’s bed consisted of
some trusses of straw, over which his hostess had spread two or three
of those old fragments of carpet, picked up heaven knows where, which
milk-women use to cover the seats of their carts. The floor was simply
the trodden earth. The walls, sweating salt-petre, green with mould,
and full of cracks, were so excessively damp that on the side where
the Colonel’s bed was a reed mat had been nailed. The famous box-coat
hung on a nail. Two pairs of old boots lay in a corner. There was not
a sign of linen. On the worm-eaten table the /Bulletins de la Grande
Armee/, reprinted by Plancher, lay open, and seemed to be the
Colonel’s reading; his countenance was calm and serene in the midst of
this squalor. His visit to Derville seemed to have altered his
features; the lawyer perceived in them traces of a happy feeling, a
particular gleam set there by hope.
“Does the smell of the pipe annoy you?” he said, placing the
dilapidated straw-bottomed chair for his lawyer.
“But, Colonel, you are dreadfully uncomfortable here!”
The speech was wrung from Derville by the distrust natural to lawyers,
and the deplorable experience which they derive early in life from the
appalling and obscure tragedies at which they look on.
“Here,” said he to himself, “is a man who has of course spent my money
in satisfying a trooper’s three theological virtues—play, wine, and
women!”
“To be sure, monsieur, we are not distinguished for luxury here. It is
a camp lodging, tempered by friendship, but–-” And the soldier shot
a deep glance at the man of law—“I have done no one wrong, I have
never turned my back on anybody, and I sleep in peace.”
Derville reflected that there would be some want of delicacy in asking
his client to account for the sums of money he had advanced, so he
merely said:
“But why would you not come to Paris, where you might have lived as
cheaply as you do here, but where you would have been better lodged?”
“Why,” replied the Colonel, “the good folks with whom I am living had
taken me in and fed me gratis for a year. How could I leave them
just when I had a little money? Besides, the father of those three
pickles is an old Egyptian—”
“An Egyptian!”
“We give that name to the troopers who came back from the expedition
into Egypt, of which I was one. Not merely are all who get back
brothers; Vergniaud was in my regiment. We have shared a draught of
water in the desert; and besides, I have not yet finished teaching his
brats to read.”
“He might have lodged you better for your money,” said Derville.
“Bah!” said the Colonel, “his children sleep on the straw as I do. He
and his wife have no better bed; they are very poor you see. They have
taken a bigger business than they can manage. But if I recover my
fortune … However, it does very well.”
“Colonel, to-morrow or the next day, I shall receive your papers from
Heilsberg. The woman who dug you out is still alive!”
“Curse the money! To think I haven’t got any!” he cried, flinging his
pipe on the ground.
Now, a well-colored pipe is to a smoker a precious possession; but the
impulse was so natural, the emotion so generous, that every smoker,
and the excise office itself, would have pardoned this crime of
treason to tobacco. Perhaps the angels may have picked up the pieces.
“Colonel, it is an exceedingly complicated business,” said Derville as
they left the room to walk up and down in the sunshine.
“To me,” said the soldier, “it appears exceedingly simple. I was
thought to be dead, and here I am! Give me back my wife and my
fortune; give me the rank of General, to which I have a right, for I
was made Colonel of the Imperial Guard the day before the battle of
Eylau.”
“Things are not done so in the legal world,” said Derville. “Listen to
me. You are Colonel Chabert, I am glad to think it; but it has to be
proved judicially to persons whose interest it will be to deny it.
Hence, your papers will be disputed. That contention will give rise to
ten or twelve preliminary inquiries. Every question will be sent under
contradiction up to the supreme court, and give rise to so many costly
suits, which will hang on for a long time, however eagerly I may push
them. Your opponents will demand an inquiry, which we cannot refuse,
and which may necessitate the sending of a commission of investigation
to Prussia. But even if we hope for the best; supposing that justice
should at once recognize you as Colonel Chabert—can we know how the
questions will be settled that will arise out of the very innocent
bigamy committed by the Comtesse Ferraud?
“In your case, the point of law is unknown to the Code, and can only
be decided as a point in equity, as a jury decides in the delicate
cases presented by the social eccentricities of some criminal
prosecutions. Now, you had no children by your marriage; M. le Comte
Ferraud has two. The judges might pronounce against the marriage where
the family ties are weakest, to the confirmation of that where they
are stronger, since it was contracted in perfect good faith. Would you
be in a very becoming moral position if you insisted, at your age, and
in your present circumstances, in resuming your rights over a woman
who no longer loves you? You will have both your wife and her husband
against you, two important persons who might influence the Bench.
Thus, there
Comments (0)