The 9/11 Deception and False Flag Terror - Terence Smart (best short novels of all time .TXT) 📗

were not hit by planes. On July 28, 1945, a B-25 bomber crashed into the 79th floor of the Empire State Building, the world’s tallest building at the time. Five floors were burnt and it took about three hours to put out the fire but it did not collapse. The Empire State Building was built using technology from 90 years ago (1930), The World Trade Centre buildings were much stronger (built 1972) and were designed to withstand an aeroplane crashing into it.

Below a picture of the Empire State Building on fire in 1945.

Leslie Robertson, one of the two original structural engineers for the World Trade Center, is asked at a conference in Frankfurt, Germany what he had done to protect the twin towers from terrorist attacks. He replies, “The twin towers were in fact the first structures outside the military and nuclear industries designed to resist the impact of a jet airplane”.

Frank A. Demartini, on-site construction manager for the World Trade Center had this to say

“The building was designed to have a fully loaded 707 crash into it. That was the largest plane at the time. I believe that the building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners because this structure is like the mosquito netting on your screen door -- this intense grid -- and the jet plane is just a pencil puncturing that screen netting. It really does nothing to the screen netting”.

Three of the experts who testified before the House Committee On Science May 1, 2002 Hearing On the Collapse of the World Trade Centre — Dr. W. Gene Corley, American Society of Civil Engineers and Chair of the Building Performance Assessment Team reviewing the WTC disaster; Dr. Arden L. Bement, Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology; and Dr. Jonathan Barnett, Professor of Fire Safety Studies at the Worcester Polytechnic Institute — all stated that fire had never caused a protected steel framed building to collapse. Yet on 9/11/01, fire was the claimed cause of three such collapses of WTC 1, WTC 2, and WTC 7.

Since all three World Trade Centre buildings collapsed on to their footprints, or the areas on which they were standing, it is necessary to consult the article, “How Building Implosions Work,” by Tom Harris in the Columbia Encyclopaedia. Harris writes: “You can demolish a stone wall with a sledgehammer, and it is fairly easy to level a five-story building using excavators and wrecking balls. But when you need to bring down a massive structure, say a 20-story skyscraper, you have other methods. Explosive demolition is the preferred method for safely and efficiently demolishing larger structures. When a building is surrounded by other buildings, it may be necessary to ‘implode’ the building, that is, make it collapse down into its footprint.”

In other words, planting explosives within a building at carefully preselected locations is the ONLY way to bring down a building on to its footprint. Conversely, if a building falls on to its footprint, we can be certain that explosives were planted within it.

But terrorists from Afghanistan would not be able to sneak past building security and stay hidden during the time they would need to plant explosives at carefully preselected locations. Even a domestic terrorist group would not be able to do this. Only those who own the Twin Towers and manage the security at the Towers would be able to do this and we know who that was.

World Trade Centre Building 7 Collapses

Why did the WT7 building collapse when no plane hit it? It did have a few fires but these could not have possibly collapsed the building as we have seen from the paragraph above. If you watch the collapse of this building on Youtube it was obviously a controlled demolition.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnLcUxV1dPo

Below a picture of WTC Building 7 which only had a few fires but collapsed like a controlled demolition at free fall speed at about 5.00 in the afternoon on 9/11.

Jewish owner of the Twin Towers Larry Silverstein stated:

“I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, ‘We’ve had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it’. And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.”

Silverstein’s comment obviously means the WTC 7 building was the result of a controlled demolition. But to prepare a building the size of WTC7 for demolition takes at least 10 days. Are we to believe that Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda wired WTC 7 for demolition? No I don’t think so.

Silverstein Properties won an $861 million award from Industrial Risk Insurers to rebuild on the site of WTC 7. Silverstein Properties’ estimated investment in WTC 7 was $386 million, netting a profit of about $500 million. The word greed comes to mind with the Jewish Silverstein, already collecting 4.5 billion from the insurance company for the terrorist strikes on the Twin Towers.

Danny Jowenko was a world renowned Dutch demolitions expert and he said of Building 7 “It’s a controlled demolition, a team of experts did this, its professional work, without a doubt.” It is one thing for the average person to suggest WTC 7 was a controlled demolition, but for a demolitions expert to say that is entirely another thing. Danny Jowenko died in a suspicious car crash in 2011 on a quiet road in Serooskerke, The Netherlands. His car supposedly hit a tree but there was no skid marks on the road and his dog was in his car but didn’t die. Dr. Alan Sabrosky, said in a radio interview in 2010, that his scepticism of the official 911 story was prompted by Jowenko's testimony. Jowenko's death comes three days after Sabrosky gave an exclusive interview to PressTV in which he again reiterated his belief.

Dr J. Leroy Hulsey, Chair of the university’s Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at Alaska University, said: ‘Fire did not and could not have caused the failure of Building 7”. His team has wrote a report about WT7 and the link to this report is below.

http://www.kaltura.com/index.php/extwidget/preview/partner_id/1909371/uiconf_id/36832722/entry_id/0_rxmrybkv/embed/auto?&flashvars[streamerType]=auto

In “Fire Inside: Structural Design with Fire Safety in Mind,” by Carolyn Berry in the August 25, 2007 issue of SCIENCE NEWS, Allen Hay, chief fire safety officer of the New York City Fire Department said concerning World Trade Centre 7: “We just expected it to burn out — we didn’t expect it to fall down.” “It’s the only building I know of in New York City to ever collapse (strictly) from fire.”

The BBC TV managed to announce to a world audience that Building 7 had collapsed twenty minutes before it happened. Reporter Jane Standley makes the announcement that WT7 has collapsed 20 minutes before it actually collapsed and you can see WT7 in the background behind her. The video that shows this is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltP2t9nq9fI. That is because they were just reading from a pre-planned script. The BBC are actively taking part in the cover up of 9/11 as is all of the media as mentioned earlier. We can see that because they could show a documentary with a lot of the information that I have collected here which shows Israeli involvement but no they keep to the same ‘Arabs’ did it script which is unproven and a lie.

Edward Griffin (Author) stated: “We are led to believe that for the first time in the known universe, a steel-framed, high-rise building was brought down by fire without the aid of explosives or incendiaries. More clearly miraculous was the precise way in which WTC7 collapsed [straight down, with an almost perfectly horizontal roofline] into its own footprint. This is the kind of free-fall implosion that can only be caused by a world-class demolition company”.

“I was one of the first medical search and rescue teams called to the disaster. My life, as this countries changed forever that day. What the public was told and what was shown on the news are two very different things. I took pictures, and have a jacket that still has dust on it. My house was robbed days after I got back home. Not only all my jewellery but my guns and 9-11 pictures and my jacket with the dust all over it within a ziplock bag were stolen. Now, who would want that stuff? I can tell you things that happened that will really blow your mind. Building 7, rescue workers were told to back out before it came down... they knew that building was coming down, it was done by professionals. Anyone who can't see that, they are suffering from Cognitive Dissonance. 17 years later, I am still scared to say too much”. YouTube comment by BobbiCat, part of the search & rescue team during 9/11 from the YouTube video 9/11: What 17 Years of Lies Have Done to us, by Richard Dolan. Richard Michael Dolan is an American historian who specializes in the UFO phenomenon, United States national security and the Cold War.

Professor Jonathan Barnett of Worcester Polytechnic Institute, who analysed a section of steel from WTC 7 and said that fire would not explain steel members in the debris pile that appear to have been partly evaporated in extraordinarily high temperatures. Another source can be attributed to civil engineering professor Abolhassan Astanch-Asl, with the University of California at Berkeley. He spent two weeks at ground zero studying steel from the buildings, one of which was a horizontal I-beam from WTC 7. Professor Astanch-Asl reported that “parts of the flat top of the I beam, once five-eighths of an inch thick, had vaporized.” This phenomenon would require temperatures of 5,182 degrees Fahrenheit.

Temperatures required to melt steel occur around 2,500 degrees F. Jet fuel, which is primarily kerosene, cannot burn much hotter than around 1,500 degrees F. Normal office fires are known to be capable of reaching temperatures of around 1,100 degrees. The Key to understanding how office fires could not have contributed to the collapse of Building 7, is the fact that steel has a terrific capacity as a heat sink. Heat applied to one section will travel and disperse that heat to whatever other steel it is attached to, necessitating many, many hours to achieve temperatures hot enough to even begin to bend steel, let alone melt it. Never in the history of modern architecture, before or after 9/11, has a steel framed skyscraper collapsed due to fire alone. Moreover, video evidence shows only a few small fires still burning at the time of Building 7’s collapse around 5:20 pm on the afternoon of 9/11.

Kurt Sonnenfeld was the FEMA videographer who, for 29 days after 9-11, filmed the crime scene at the World Trade Center, including the sub-basement levels of WTC 6 and 7.

Kurt Sonnenfeld released his book El Perseguido (The Persecuted) on May 8, 2009, at the 35th Annual Buenos Aires Book Fair in Argentina, where he lives in exile since 2003. Sonnenfeld's book tells the history of his persecution at the hands of U.S. authorities over the course of more than seven years after his official mission to Ground Zero as FEMA’s videographer.

Kurt Sonnenfeld gave an interview about WT7 and said: “What happened with Building 7 is incredibly suspicious. I have video that shows how curiously small the rubble pile was, and how the buildings to either side were untouched by Building Seven when it collapsed. It had not been hit by an airplane; it had suffered only minor injuries when the Twin Towers collapsed, and there were only small fires on a couple of floors. There’s no way that building could have imploded the way it did without controlled demolition. Yet the collapse of Building 7 was hardly mentioned by the mainstream media and suspiciously ignored by the 911 Commission”.

If WT7 was a controlled demolition then the government’s version of events on 9/11 was a lie. Maybe WT7 was being used to co-ordinate the events of 9/11 and they had to bring it down to hide the evidence. I will also note that the CIA had offices in the WT7 building. WT7 was also built by one of the owners of the Twin Towers, Larry Silverstein, what a coincidence.

The link below