Why we hate you? - Assous.M (reading books for 4 year olds .TXT) 📗
- Author: Assous.M
Book online «Why we hate you? - Assous.M (reading books for 4 year olds .TXT) 📗». Author Assous.M
(many of them women, as the examples here show) who will shape the democratic futures of those countries -- if those countries are to have democratic futures at all.)
Source: James Sloan Allen is the author of "Worldly Wisdom: Great Books and the Meaning(s) of Life," to be published next year.
Many European writers had tried to understand why Arabs and Muslims peoples hated U.S.
Read Proliferator-in-chief
• Leader
• The Guardian, Thursday 26 July 2001 10.48 BST
• Article history
(George Bush's administration yesterday blasted another lethal hole in the vital structure of multilateral arms agreements that has so far protected most of the world from the worst dangers of the modern military age. America's lone, wanton wrecking of long-running negotiations to enforce the 1972 treaty banning biological or germ weapons is an insult to the pact's 142 other signatories, a body-blow for the treaty itself and a major setback for international efforts to agree practical curbs on the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.
By this action, the US suggests that its national security interests, narrowly defined, and the commercial interests of its dominant biotechnology sector should take precedence over responsible global collaboration to meet a common threat. By rejecting the proposed inspection regime, it further, dangerously, suggests to others that the US is not really worried about germ-warfare controls and wants to develop its own, advanced biological weapons.
This in turn could have a serious impact on continuing efforts to bolster the equally important chemical weapons convention. Since Tony Blair's government has been particularly active in promoting the BWC enforcement protocol, it may now be expected to be particularly active in condemning this latest piece of Bush vandalism. Jack Straw should summon the US ambassador, a Bush appointee, to the Foreign Office and demand an explanation.
The US move confirms a pattern of reckless, unilateralist behavior on arms control, as on environmental and other issues. Since taking office, Mr. Bush has spoken in grandiose terms of the need for "new thinking" and for a "new strategic framework". But to date, this supposed post-cold war global security "vision" has largely amounted to trashing existing agreements without any clear idea of what to put in their place.
Mr. Bush scorns the concept of deterrence, based on mutually assured destruction, but fails to explain how the world can safely live without it. He plans to resume nuclear testing, undermining the comprehensive test ban treaty. He intends to breach the anti-ballistic missile treaty. He wants to develop "bunker-buster" battlefield warheads, ignoring the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. He emasculated recent UN attempts to regulate small arms and light weaponry. Meanwhile, he is dusting off Ronald Reagan's plans to deploy space weapons - plans that Mr. Reagan's former rival, Jimmy Carter, tersely described this week as "technologically ridiculous".
Yet all this charging about in the arms control crockery shop does little or nothing to reduce the biggest actual, as opposed to hypothetical, threat: that posed by relatively cheap, easily produced biological and chemical weapons and by "portable" nukes that may be obtained by transnational terrorists. Indeed, by deflecting attention and resources, it makes it worse. In recent days, four instances of smuggling of nuclear-related material have come to light in Europe. This coincides with a review of Clinton era schemes to help Russia safeguard or dispose of stockpiles. One $2.1bn programme, to destroy military plutonium, faces cancellation. Others may be offered with political strings attached. No wonder the black market is booming.
The so-called "rogue states" are not the principal problem - and missile defence is certainly no answer. The core problem is proliferation - and the undermining of painstakingly agreed, multilateral arms control structures. Instead of helping, Commander-in-chief Bush is fast becoming the new proliferators-in-chief. )
Today is not Arab and Islamic peoples the only who hate America , on the contrary , America gained new enemies in all the word , that is reflected in many manifestations all over the world , from France to Korea. You can visit internet websites to see millions of pictures and videos about these manifestations.
Many caricatures all over the world against U.S policy:
Iran against U.S
Korea against U.S
A South Korean Catholic nun walks by a cutout depicting a caricature of a cow infected with mad-cow disease during a candlelight vigil protesting against U.S. beef imports in front of the Seoul City Hall.
Egyptian caricature
Cheque people against Bush administration
French people against Bush
French people against bush administration
World are plotting against U.S
Fight against US.
At last American people should know the truth, Arabic and Muslims peoples doesn’t hate you, instead every one of us like to live with you because of your generous .Arabic and Muslims people hate U.S government policy.
In fact Americans are peaceful people and people of peace, hate wars wherever they are, hate injustice and tyranny.
American people was the first people who was against bush administration, we have many pictures about this subject.
All these pictures show courage and nobility of Americans:
Picture 1
Picture 2
Caricature 1
Picture 3
Picture 4
Picture 5
We must recognize today that Barrack Obama have to do his best to change this ugly picture of America in Arabs and Muslims minds. And the question will be in the future: why they love us? And I’m sure that all Arab and Muslim peoples will say in all honesty: we love you because you are the bright picture of justice in the entire world.
Perhaps Mr.obama will be like George Washington or Woodrow Wilson.
In bog edition (http://www.kyle-brady.com/2009/05/11/how-obama-can-change-american-politics-forever/) an American has written
(With an approval rating that continues to be the highest seen in our brief American history, Obama is what a large majority of the country seems to have desired – especially among the younger generations. Rush Limbaugh, Bill O’Reilly, and the rest of the GOP are not helping matters by continuing to drive young voters, intellectuals, and the rationally-minded away from the elephantine party. Not necessarily turning Republicans into Democrats, but nonetheless alienating growing numbers of Americans).
All humanity needs love and peace.
Remember now together the poem of Fanny Crosby (1820-1915) American hymn writer, this woman who was blind but she was seeing truth by her great brave,and generous heart, and she was hopeful woman.
Oh, say, can you see, by the dawn's early light,
What so proudly we hail'd at the twilight's last gleaming?
Whose broad stripes and bright stars, thro' the perilous fight,
O'er the ramparts we watch'd, were so gallantly streaming?
And the rockets' red glare, the bombs bursting in air,
Gave proof thro' the night that our flag was still there.
O say, does that star-spangled banner yet wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave?
On the shore dimly seen thro' the mists of the deep,
Where the foe's haughty host in dread silence reposes,
What is that which the breeze, o'er the towering steep,
As it fitfully blows, half conceals, half discloses?
Now it catches the gleam of the morning's first beam,
In full glory reflected, now shines on the stream:
'T is the star-spangled banner: O, long may it wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave!
And where is that band who so vauntingly swore
That the havoc of war and the battle's confusion
A home and a country should leave us no more?
Their blood has wash'd out their foul footsteps' pollution.
No refuge could save the hireling and slave
From the terror of flight or the gloom of the grave:
And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave.
O, thus be it ever when freemen shall stand,
Between their lov'd homes and the war's desolation;
Blest with vict'ry and peace, may the heav'n-rescued land
Praise the Pow'r that hath made and preserv'd us as a nation!
Then conquer we must, when our cause is just,
And this be our motto: "In God is our trust"
And the star-spangled banner in triumph shall wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave!
Imprint
Source: James Sloan Allen is the author of "Worldly Wisdom: Great Books and the Meaning(s) of Life," to be published next year.
Many European writers had tried to understand why Arabs and Muslims peoples hated U.S.
Read Proliferator-in-chief
• Leader
• The Guardian, Thursday 26 July 2001 10.48 BST
• Article history
(George Bush's administration yesterday blasted another lethal hole in the vital structure of multilateral arms agreements that has so far protected most of the world from the worst dangers of the modern military age. America's lone, wanton wrecking of long-running negotiations to enforce the 1972 treaty banning biological or germ weapons is an insult to the pact's 142 other signatories, a body-blow for the treaty itself and a major setback for international efforts to agree practical curbs on the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.
By this action, the US suggests that its national security interests, narrowly defined, and the commercial interests of its dominant biotechnology sector should take precedence over responsible global collaboration to meet a common threat. By rejecting the proposed inspection regime, it further, dangerously, suggests to others that the US is not really worried about germ-warfare controls and wants to develop its own, advanced biological weapons.
This in turn could have a serious impact on continuing efforts to bolster the equally important chemical weapons convention. Since Tony Blair's government has been particularly active in promoting the BWC enforcement protocol, it may now be expected to be particularly active in condemning this latest piece of Bush vandalism. Jack Straw should summon the US ambassador, a Bush appointee, to the Foreign Office and demand an explanation.
The US move confirms a pattern of reckless, unilateralist behavior on arms control, as on environmental and other issues. Since taking office, Mr. Bush has spoken in grandiose terms of the need for "new thinking" and for a "new strategic framework". But to date, this supposed post-cold war global security "vision" has largely amounted to trashing existing agreements without any clear idea of what to put in their place.
Mr. Bush scorns the concept of deterrence, based on mutually assured destruction, but fails to explain how the world can safely live without it. He plans to resume nuclear testing, undermining the comprehensive test ban treaty. He intends to breach the anti-ballistic missile treaty. He wants to develop "bunker-buster" battlefield warheads, ignoring the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. He emasculated recent UN attempts to regulate small arms and light weaponry. Meanwhile, he is dusting off Ronald Reagan's plans to deploy space weapons - plans that Mr. Reagan's former rival, Jimmy Carter, tersely described this week as "technologically ridiculous".
Yet all this charging about in the arms control crockery shop does little or nothing to reduce the biggest actual, as opposed to hypothetical, threat: that posed by relatively cheap, easily produced biological and chemical weapons and by "portable" nukes that may be obtained by transnational terrorists. Indeed, by deflecting attention and resources, it makes it worse. In recent days, four instances of smuggling of nuclear-related material have come to light in Europe. This coincides with a review of Clinton era schemes to help Russia safeguard or dispose of stockpiles. One $2.1bn programme, to destroy military plutonium, faces cancellation. Others may be offered with political strings attached. No wonder the black market is booming.
The so-called "rogue states" are not the principal problem - and missile defence is certainly no answer. The core problem is proliferation - and the undermining of painstakingly agreed, multilateral arms control structures. Instead of helping, Commander-in-chief Bush is fast becoming the new proliferators-in-chief. )
Today is not Arab and Islamic peoples the only who hate America , on the contrary , America gained new enemies in all the word , that is reflected in many manifestations all over the world , from France to Korea. You can visit internet websites to see millions of pictures and videos about these manifestations.
Many caricatures all over the world against U.S policy:
Iran against U.S
Korea against U.S
A South Korean Catholic nun walks by a cutout depicting a caricature of a cow infected with mad-cow disease during a candlelight vigil protesting against U.S. beef imports in front of the Seoul City Hall.
Egyptian caricature
Cheque people against Bush administration
French people against Bush
French people against bush administration
World are plotting against U.S
Fight against US.
At last American people should know the truth, Arabic and Muslims peoples doesn’t hate you, instead every one of us like to live with you because of your generous .Arabic and Muslims people hate U.S government policy.
In fact Americans are peaceful people and people of peace, hate wars wherever they are, hate injustice and tyranny.
American people was the first people who was against bush administration, we have many pictures about this subject.
All these pictures show courage and nobility of Americans:
Picture 1
Picture 2
Caricature 1
Picture 3
Picture 4
Picture 5
We must recognize today that Barrack Obama have to do his best to change this ugly picture of America in Arabs and Muslims minds. And the question will be in the future: why they love us? And I’m sure that all Arab and Muslim peoples will say in all honesty: we love you because you are the bright picture of justice in the entire world.
Perhaps Mr.obama will be like George Washington or Woodrow Wilson.
In bog edition (http://www.kyle-brady.com/2009/05/11/how-obama-can-change-american-politics-forever/) an American has written
(With an approval rating that continues to be the highest seen in our brief American history, Obama is what a large majority of the country seems to have desired – especially among the younger generations. Rush Limbaugh, Bill O’Reilly, and the rest of the GOP are not helping matters by continuing to drive young voters, intellectuals, and the rationally-minded away from the elephantine party. Not necessarily turning Republicans into Democrats, but nonetheless alienating growing numbers of Americans).
All humanity needs love and peace.
Remember now together the poem of Fanny Crosby (1820-1915) American hymn writer, this woman who was blind but she was seeing truth by her great brave,and generous heart, and she was hopeful woman.
Oh, say, can you see, by the dawn's early light,
What so proudly we hail'd at the twilight's last gleaming?
Whose broad stripes and bright stars, thro' the perilous fight,
O'er the ramparts we watch'd, were so gallantly streaming?
And the rockets' red glare, the bombs bursting in air,
Gave proof thro' the night that our flag was still there.
O say, does that star-spangled banner yet wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave?
On the shore dimly seen thro' the mists of the deep,
Where the foe's haughty host in dread silence reposes,
What is that which the breeze, o'er the towering steep,
As it fitfully blows, half conceals, half discloses?
Now it catches the gleam of the morning's first beam,
In full glory reflected, now shines on the stream:
'T is the star-spangled banner: O, long may it wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave!
And where is that band who so vauntingly swore
That the havoc of war and the battle's confusion
A home and a country should leave us no more?
Their blood has wash'd out their foul footsteps' pollution.
No refuge could save the hireling and slave
From the terror of flight or the gloom of the grave:
And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave.
O, thus be it ever when freemen shall stand,
Between their lov'd homes and the war's desolation;
Blest with vict'ry and peace, may the heav'n-rescued land
Praise the Pow'r that hath made and preserv'd us as a nation!
Then conquer we must, when our cause is just,
And this be our motto: "In God is our trust"
And the star-spangled banner in triumph shall wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave!
Imprint
Publication Date: 09-07-2009
All Rights Reserved
Free e-book «Why we hate you? - Assous.M (reading books for 4 year olds .TXT) 📗» - read online now
Similar e-books:
Comments (0)