Terminal Compromise - Winn Schwartau (fiction book recommendations TXT) 📗
- Author: Winn Schwartau
- Performer: -
Book online «Terminal Compromise - Winn Schwartau (fiction book recommendations TXT) 📗». Author Winn Schwartau
site food.
“Sounds like whoever dies with the most hacks wins,” Scott said
facetiously.
“Right. You got it, mate.” Pinball never looked up from his food
while talking.
Scott scanned his luncheon companions for reaction. A couple of
grunts, no objection. What an odd assortment, Scott thought. At
least the Flying Dutchman had been kind enough to assemble an
English speaking group for Scott’s benefit.
“We each have our reasons to hack,” said the one who called
himself Che2. By all appearance Che2 seemed more suited to a BMW
than a revolutionary cabal. He was a well bred American, dressed
casually but expensively. “We may not agree with each other, or
anyone, but we have an underlying understanding that permits us
to cooperate.”
“I can tell you why I hack,” said the sole German representative
at the table who spoke impeccable English with a thick accent “I
am a professional ethicist. It is people like me who help gov-
ernments formulate rules that decide who lives and who dies in
emergency situations. The right or wrong of weapons of mass
destruction. Ethics is a social moving target that must con-
stantly be re-examined as we as a civilized people grow and
strive to maintain our innate humanity.”
“So you equate hacking and ethics, in the same breath?” Scott
asked.
“I certainly do,” said the middle aged German hacker known as
Solon. “I am part of a group that promotes the Hacker Ethic. It
is really quite simple, if you would be interested.” Scott urged
him to continue. “We have before us, as a world, a marvelous
opportunity, to create a set of rules, behavior and attitudes
towards this magnificent technology that blossoms before our
eyes. That law is the Ethic, some call it the Code.” Kirk had
called it the Code, too.
“The Code is quite a crock,” interrupted a tall slender man with
disheveled white hair who spoke with an upper crust, ever so
proper British accent. “Unless everybody follows it, from A to
Zed, it simply won’t work. There can be no exceptions. Other-
wise my friends, we will find ourselves in a technological Lord
of the Flies.”
“Ah, but that is already happening,” said a gentleman in his mid-
fifties, who also sported a full beard, bushy mustache and long
well kept salt and pepper hair to his shoulders. “We are already
well on the road to a date with Silicon Armageddon. We didn’t do
it with the Bomb, but it looks like we’re sure as hell gonna do
it with technology for the masses. In this case computers.”
Going only by ‘Dave’, he was a Philosophy Professor at Stanford.
In many ways he spoke like the early Timothy Leary, using tech-
nology instead of drugs as a mental catalyst. Scott though of
Dave as the futurist in the group.
“He’s right. It is happening, right now. Long Live the Revolu-
tion,” shouted Che2. “Hacking keeps our personal freedoms alive.
I know I’d much prefer everyone knowing my most intimate secrets
than have the government and TRW and the FBI and the CIA control
it and use only pieces of it for their greed-sucking reasons. No
way. I want everyone to have the tools to get into the Govern-
ment’s Big Brother computer system and make the changes they see
fit.”
Scott listened as his one comment spawned a heated and animated
discussion. He wouldn’t break in unless they went too far
afield, wherever that was, or he simply wanted to join in on the
conversation.
“How can you support freedom without responsibility? You contra-
dict yourself by ignoring the Code.” Solon made his comment with
Teutonic matter of factness in between mouthfuls.
“It is the most responsible thing we can do,” retorted Che2. “It
is our moral duty, our responsibility to the world to protect our
privacy, our rights, before they are stripped away as they have
been since the Republicans bounced in, but not out, over a decade
ago.” He turned in his chair and glared at Scott. Maybe thirty
years old, Che2 was mostly bald with great bushes of curly dark
brown hair encircling his head. The lack of hair emphasized his
large forehead which stood over his deeply inset eyes. Che2
called the Boston area his home but his cosmopolitan accent
belied his background.
The proper British man known as Doctor Doctor, DRDR on the BBS’s,
was over six foot five with an unruly frock of thick white hair
which framed his ruddy pale face. “I do beg your pardon, but
this so violates the tenets of civilized behavior. What this
gentleman proposes is the philosophical antithesis of common
sense and rationality. I suggest we consider the position that
each of us in actual fact is working for the establishment, if I
may use such a politically pass descriptor.” DRDR’s comment
hushed the table. He continued. “Is it not true that security
is being installed as a result of many of our activities?”
Several nods of agreement preceded a small voice coming from the
far end of the table. “If you want to call it security.” A
small pre-adolescent spoke in a high pitched whine.
“What do you mean . . .I’m sorry, I don’t know what to call you,”
asked Scott.
“GWhiz. The security is a toy.”
GWhiz spoke unpretentiously about how incredibly simple it is to
crack any security system. He maintained that there are theoret-
ical methods to crack into any, and he emphasized any, computer.
“It’s impossible to protect a computer 100%. Can’t be done. So
that means that every computer is crackable.” He offered to
explain the math to Scott who politely feigned ignorance of
decimal points. “In short, I, or anyone, can get into any
computer they want. There is always a way.”
“Isn’t that a scary thought?” Scott asked to no one in particu-
lar.
Scott learned from the others that GWhiz was a 16 year old high
school junior from Phoenix, Arizona. He measured on the high-end
of the genius scale, joined Mensa at 4 and already had in hand
scholarships from Westinghouse, Mellon, CalTech, MIT, Stanford
to name a few. At the tender age of 7 he started programming and
was now fluent in eleven computer languages. GWhiz was regarded
with an intellectual awe from hackers for his theoretical analy-
ses that he had turned into hacking tools. He was a walking
encyclopedia of methods and techniques to both protect and attack
computers. To GWhiz, straddling the political fence by arming
both sides with the same weapons was a logical choice. Scott
viewed it as a high tech MAD – Mutual Assured Destruction, com-
puter wise.
“Don’t you see,” said the British DRDR, continuing as if there
had been no interruption. “The media portrays us as security
breaking phreaks, and that’s exactly what we are. And that works
for the establishment as well. We keep the designers and securi-
ty people honest by testing their systems for free. What a great
deal, don’t you think? We, the hackers of the world, are the
Good Housekeeping Seal of security systems by virtue of the fact
that either we can or we cannot penetrate them. If that’s not
working for the system, I don’t know what is.”
“DRDR’s heading down the right path,” Dave the futurist spoke
up. “Even though he does work for GCHQ.”
“GCHQ?” Scott asked quickly.
“The English version of your NSA,” said Pinball, still engrossed
in his food.
“I do not!” protested DRDR. “Besides, what difference would it
make if I did?” He asked more defensively.
“None, none at all,” agreed Dave. “The effect is the same.
However, if you are an MI-5 or MI-6 or whatever, that would show
a great deal of unanticipated foresight on the part of your
government. I wish ours would think farther ahead than today’s
headlines. I have found that people everywhere in the world see
the problem as one of hackers, rather than the fundamental issues
that are at stake. We hackers are manifestations of the problems
that technology has bequeathed us. If any of our governments
were actually responsive enough to listen, they would have a
great deal of concern for the emerging infrastructure that
doesn’t have a leader. Now, I’m not taking a side on this one,
but I am saying that if I were the government, I would sure as
all hell want to know what was going on in the trenches. The U.S.
especially.”
Everyone seemed to agree with that.
“But they’re too caught up in their own meaningless self-sustain-
ing parasitic lives to realize that a new world is shaping around
them.” When Che2 spoke, he spoke his mind, leaving no doubt as
to how he felt. “They don’t have the smarts to get involved and
see it first hand. Which is fine by me, because, as you said,”
he said pointing at DRDR, “it doesn’t matter. They wouldn’t
listen to him anyway. It gives us more time to build
Comments (0)