bookssland.com Ā» Philosophy Ā» The Attic Murder - S. Fowler Wright (ebook reader computer TXT) šŸ“—

Book online Ā«The Attic Murder - S. Fowler Wright (ebook reader computer TXT) šŸ“—Ā». Author S. Fowler Wright



1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... 36
Go to page:
in Sir Reginaldā€™s office, with no excess of cordiality on either side, that they had come to the same decision as to the identity of the wanted man.

In arriving at this conclusion it was already evident that Mr. Banks had had the benefit of the knowledge of some circumstances of the crime of which the Inspector had not been equally well informed, but if we regard the matter with an entire impartiality we must observe also that Mr. Banks had not had the benefit of hearing Sir Lionel Tipshiftā€™s opinion that the crime had been the work of a left-handed man.

It was after Miss Weston had completed a narrative which may be conveniently deferred, as it was given with greater precision in the witness-box on a later day, that Mr. Banks said ā€œWell, I donā€™t know what you think, Inspector, but I should say that you wonā€™t have to look farther than the top floor of number seven to find the man that you want.ā€

ā€œMeaning Entwistle?ā€

ā€œMeaning Long Pete, of course. Thatā€™s what heā€™s mostly called in his own crowd.ā€

The Inspector was aware of the name usually applied to Peter Entwistle in the criminal circles that were supposed to make use of his skill. But he dissented from the enquiry agentā€™s description.

ā€œHis own crowd?ā€ he said. ā€œYou canā€™t say thereā€™s any to which he really belongs. Thatā€™s been whatā€™s kept him clear of our hands for the last ten years, and he making a fortune the while, at a safe guess. He doesnā€™t drink, he doesnā€™t gamble, he doesnā€™t mix with any of the gangs among whom we may have one or two who know how to give us the information we want at the right time; and so heā€™s kept out of our hands for more years than one of his kind probably ever did since weā€™ve been an organized force.ā€

ā€œThe gentleman,ā€ Sir Reginald interrupted, ā€œseems to be an interesting character. Do you mind telling me what his occupation is supposed to be, and why you conclude that heā€™s the most likely man to have murdered a bank inspector four doors away?ā€

Inspector Combridge answered: ā€œItā€™s a matter of deduction, of course. Iā€™m not sure that weā€™ve got evidence enough even to justify an arrest. But thatā€™s been the difficulty with Mr. Entwistle since I heard of him first in connection with the Bradwell forgeries, nearly ten years ago.

ā€œHeā€™s a handwriting expert, and an artist in more ways than one. He taught engraving for two years at a Municipal Technical School in North London, and since he gave that up heā€™s been doing landscape painting ā€” actually sold one or two pictures, I believe, for moderate amounts.

ā€œBut his main occupation, if he isnā€™t a greatly misjudged man, is that of forging cheques and other documents.

ā€œHe does just that, and no more. He wonā€™t mix himself up in procuring specimen signatures, or passing the documents, or ā€” in fact, in anything but the actual use of his pen, and itā€™s said that he only asks a ten per cent commission on the face value of the cheques he forges, but he insists on that, cash down at the time, and wonā€™t listen to other terms.

ā€œIt follows that he only deals with those gangs that are well-established and well-financed, and you can see that if he does nothing to give himself away he isnā€™t easy to catch.

ā€œWeā€™ve laid traps for him more than once, but heā€™s been too wary to walk in; and weā€™ve tried, without any success, to get someone to give him away.

ā€œThe curious thing about him is that heā€™s ambidextrous. Heā€™s called left-handed, but thatā€™s not exactly correct. He can imitate some signatures with his right hand, and some with his left; and, with one or other, heā€™ll sign your name so that youā€™ll swear itā€™s genuine yourself, though you canā€™t remember writing it.

ā€œHeā€™s never made any secret of that capacity ā€” boasts of it, in fact ā€” and of course itā€™s no crime to be expert with a pen; and being so open about it is in his favour rather than not. But weā€™ve known what heā€™s done more than once, and only been just short of the legal proof which would have justified an arrest.ā€

ā€œYou mean,ā€ Sir Reginald replied, ā€œthe forging of cheques, such as those which have been causing such losses to us?ā€

ā€œYes. Itā€™s never been less than an even guess that they were his work, and itā€™s ten to one now.ā€

ā€œBut how far does that connect him with Raboneā€™s death?ā€

ā€œItā€™s only inference, as Iā€™ve said. But hereā€™s a man leaving Raboneā€™s window immediately after heā€™s killed, and Miss Weston follows this man ā€” though she canā€™t say who he was ā€” to the window of the house where Entwistle lives. And thereā€™s a man named Bigland on the floor below him, who was wide awake enough to hear her feet going down the stairs, when she escaped by the same way, but didnā€™t hear anyone who would have had a much heavier tread.

ā€œAnd thereā€™s the fact that Rabone had visitors before who came to him over the roof, and from where else would they be? We canā€™t suppose that it was a general habit in that street to make midnight calls on Mr. Rabone over the slates.

ā€œWhen you add to that the conspiracy that Rabone was either engaged in himself or on the point of discovering ā€” you can read this letter either way, but itā€™s got to be one of the two ā€” and the occupation by which weā€™ve no doubt that Entwistle lives, and youā€™ve got the kind of case with which we usually have to begin. We know the fact well enough, and weā€™ve just got to settle down on it till weā€™ve built up the formal proof that the law requires.

ā€œI donā€™t say that weā€™ve got it yet, by a long way, especially as thereā€™s no legal evidence of motive of a kind that we should be allowed to mention in court, but thereā€™s one point that helps a little, and that is that Sir Lionelā€™s almost sure that it was the work of a left-handed man, who attacked Rabone from behind.ā€

ā€œWell,ā€ Mr. Banks commented on this somewhat lengthy statement of the official attitude, ā€œif that isnā€™t enough to justify you in laying him by the heels, I must say youā€™re not easy to please.ā€

ā€œPerhaps Iā€™m not. But it seems that weā€™ve got to own up to one mistake already, and thatā€™s more than enough. We canā€™t risk an acquittal for lack of evidence, on the top of that, or perhaps even a discharge from the Magistratesā€™ Court.ā€

ā€œI thought,ā€ Sir Reginald interposed again, ā€œthat it was a theory at the Yard that criminals always keep to their own type of offence. Is Mr. Entwistle supposed to be equally addicted to violent murder and forging cheques? The combinationā€™s rather unusual, isnā€™t it?ā€

ā€œYes,ā€ the Inspector admitted frankly, ā€œso we do; and so, no doubt, it is. And if this were a crime committed under rather different circumstances, I should say it would let Entwistle out. If it were a case of violent homicide in the course of a burglary, for instance, we shouldnā€™t give him a thought.

ā€œBut youā€™ve got to consider the position of a very cautious and successful criminal whoā€™s avoided all contact with the law, as very few criminals do, and who (we may suppose) suddenly finds himself in desperate peril because Raboneā€™s going to squeal, and he takes the one course that remains. Itā€™s a crime that grows naturally, so to speak, from what he has done before, however different its kind.

ā€œHe must be an exceptionally wily and cool-blooded character, or he wouldnā€™t have walked free as long as he has.

ā€œAnd you thinkā€ ā€” Sir Reginaldā€™s tone was still doubtful ā€” ā€ that this murder was planned in a way that makes it look consistent with what his characterā€™s likely to be? Thereā€™s not much discretion in changing a risk of being arrested for forgery for a seat in the condemned cell.ā€

ā€œPerhaps not. But he couldnā€™t guess that Miss Weston would be hopping out on to the roof. And as to the condemned cell ā€” well, heā€™s not there yet!ā€

It was a statement which Sir Reginald could not dispute. But he saw reason to hope that the Inspectorā€™s diagnosis of the position was correct, for, if so, he might have a sound expectation that the losses that his bank had suffered during recent years would have reached an end, and that in a way which he much preferred ā€” without the publicity which a prosecution on the direct issue would have involved.

Chapter XIX

MR. JELLIPOT went back to his office, conscious of some arrears of work which would keep him later than it was his habit to stay, but content that the afternoon had not been wasted. He felt that Inspector Combridge was finally convinced of Francis Hammertonā€™s innocence of the graver charge, though he was modest enough to attribute this result more to Miss Westonā€™s eloquence than his own.

That being so, he had been content to leave the charge hanging over his clientā€™s head until the remand hearing in a weekā€™s time.

The Inspector had, in fact, never felt satisfied that Francis Hammerton had been more than an accessory in, or perhaps after, the crime; and that suspicion had been based mainly on the possession of the money, which had now been plausibly explained away. His best hope, which he had now put aside, had been that the murder charge would have induced a confession by which it would have become possible to fix the guilt upon the principal criminal.

But Mr. Jellipot had seen that the Inspector was reluctant to go to the length of publicly abandoning the case against Francis Hammerton until he should be prepared to demonstrate the activity of his Department by another arrest. As a more serious argument, he had said that the difficulty of establishing a case against the man whom he now regarded as the almost certain criminal might be increased if it were publicly known that the charge against Harold Vaughan had been withdrawn. At present, the criminal must be easy in the belief that the police were working to build up a case against an absolutely innocent man, and one who could do nothing to give him away, knowing nothing of whom he was, or of the circumstances that had led up to the crime.

Mr. Jellipot, accepting this position, had made a bargain which might be to his clientā€™s future advantage, and was certainly conducive to his present peace. He had stipulated that, if he should concur in Francis Hammerton remaining under the charge of murder for another week (which he had no legal means of preventing, though he might have urged arguments to which Inspector Combridge would not have refused to listen), his true name should not be made public at the remand hearing, unless the course of the proceedings should render it a disclosure which could not be avoided.

When he reminded himself that his client was already convicted on another charge, and that the withdrawal of that of murder would make no immediate change in the fact of his confinement, and might even be unfavourable to its conditions, he concluded that the bargain was not one of which Francis could have cause to complain.

He turned his mind to the greater difficulty with which he was still confronted ā€” that of proving his clientā€™s innocence of a crime of which he had been already convicted.

Chapter XX

DURING the remainder of the week, two things happened which, though not of spectacular character, were important in their influence upon the events of the drama which was to

1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... 36
Go to page:

Free e-book Ā«The Attic Murder - S. Fowler Wright (ebook reader computer TXT) šŸ“—Ā» - read online now

Comments (0)

There are no comments yet. You can be the first!
Add a comment