bookssland.com » Philosophy » Martin Luther King Jr. Day Anthology - - (comprehension books .TXT) 📗
  • Author: -
  • Performer: -

Book online «Martin Luther King Jr. Day Anthology - - (comprehension books .TXT) 📗». Author -



1 ... 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72
Go to page:
cure to suggest, but only old and tried methods of commonplace growth.

 

The underlying causes of the trouble in the country being plainly ignorance and prejudice, we must meet ignorance and prejudice with their antidotes, education and association.

 

Every effort should be made to extend free education among both Negroes and white people. A great extension of education is now going forward in the South. The Negro is not by any means getting his full share; but, as certainly as sunshine makes things grow, education in the South will produce tolerance. That there is already such a growing tolerance no one who has talked with the leading white men in the South can doubt. The old fire-eating, Negro-baiting leaders of the Tillman-Vardaman type are swiftly passing away: a far better and broader group is coming into power.

 

In his last book, Mr. Edgar Gardner Murphy, of Alabama, expresses this new point of view when he says,—

 

‘There is no question here as to the unrestricted admission [to the ballot] of the great masses of our ignorant and semi-ignorant blacks. I know no advocate of such admission. But the question is as to whether the individuals of the race, upon conditions or restrictions legally imposed and fairly administered, shall be admitted to adequate and increasing representation in the electorate. And as that question is more seriously and more generally considered, many of the leading publicists of the South, I am glad to say, are quietly resolved that the answer shall be in the affirmative.’

 

From an able Southern white man, a resident of New Orleans, I received recently a letter containing these words:—

 

‘I believe we have reached the bottom, and a sort of quiescent period. I think it most likely that from now on there will be a gradual increase of the Negro vote. And I honestly believe that the less said about it, the surer the increase will be.’

 

Education—and by education I mean education of all sorts, industrial, professional, classical, in accordance with each man’s talents—will not only produce breadth and tolerance, but will help to cure the apathy which now keeps so many thousands of both white men and Negroes from the polls: for it will show them that it is necessary for every man to exercise all the political rights within his reach. If he fails voluntarily to take advantage of the rights he already has, how shall he acquire more rights?

 

And as ignorance must be met by education, so prejudice must be met with its antidote, which is association. Democracy does not consist in mere voting, but in association, the spirit of common effort, of which the ballot is a mere visible expression. When we come to know one another we soon find that the points of likeness are much more numerous than the points of difference. And this human association for the common good, which is democracy, is difficult to bring about anywhere, whether among different classes of white people, or between white people and Negroes. As one of the leaders of the Negro race, Dr. Du Bois, has said,—

 

‘Herein lies the tragedy of the age. Not that men are poor: all men know something of poverty. Not that men are wicked: who is good? Not that men are ignorant: what is truth? Nay, but that men know so little of each other.’

 

After the Atlanta riot I attended a number of conferences between leading white men and leading colored men. It is true those meetings bore evidence of awkwardness and embarrassment, for they were among the first of the sort to take place in the South, but they were none the less valuable. A white man told me after one of the meetings,—

 

‘I did not know that there were any such sensible Negroes in the South.’

 

And a Negro told me that it was the first time in his life that he had ever heard a Southern white man reason in a friendly way with a Negro concerning their common difficulties.

 

More and more these associations of white and colored men, at certain points of contact, must and will come about. Already, in connection with various educational and business projects in the South, white and colored men meet on common grounds, and the way has been opened to a wider mutual understanding. And it is common enough now, where it was unheard of a few years ago, for both white men and Negroes to speak from the same platform in the South. I have attended a number of such meetings. Thus slowly—

awkwardly, at first, for two centuries of prejudice are not immediately overcome—the white man and Negro will come to know one another, not merely as master and servant, but as co-workers.

These things cannot be forced.

 

One reason why the white man and the Negro have not got together more rapidly in the South than they have, is because they have tried always to meet at the sorest points. When sensible people, who must live together whether or no, find that there are points at which they cannot agree, it is the part of wisdom to avoid these points, and to meet upon other and common interests. Upon no other terms, indeed, can a democracy exist, for in no imaginable future state will individuals cease to disagree with one another upon something less than half of all the problems of life.

 

‘Here we all live together in a great country,’ say the apostles of this view; ‘let us all get together and develop it. Let the Negro do his best to educate himself, to own his own land, and to buy and sell with the white people in the fairest possible way.’

 

It is wonderful, indeed, how close together men who are stooping to a common task soon come.

 

Now, buying and selling, land ownership and common material pursuits, may not be the highest points of contact between man and man, but they are real points, and help to give men an idea of the worth of their fellows, white or black. How many times, in the South, I heard white men speak in high admiration of some Negro farmer who had been successful, or of some Negro blacksmith who was a worthy citizen, or of some Negro doctor who was a leader of his race.

 

It is curious, once a man (any man, white or black) learns to do his job well, how he finds himself in a democratic relationship with other men. I remember asking a prominent white citizen of a town in Central Georgia if he knew anything about Tuskegee. He said,—

 

‘Yes: I had rather a curious experience last fall. I was building a hotel and couldn’t get any one to do the plastering as I wanted it done. One day I saw two Negro plasterers at work in a new house that a friend of mine was building. I watched them for an hour. They seemed to know their trade. I invited them to come over and see me. They came, took the contract for my work, hired a white man to carry mortar at a dollar a day, and when they got through it was the best job of plastering in town. I found that they had learned their trade at Tuskegee. They averaged four dollars a day each in wages. We tried to get them to locate in our town, but they went back to school.’

 

When I was in Mississippi a prominent banker showed me his business letter-heads.

 

‘Good job, isn’t it?’ he said. ‘A Negro printer did it. He wrote to me asking if he might bid on my work. I replied that although I had known him a long time I couldn’t give him the job merely because he was a Negro. He told me to forget his color, and said that if he couldn’t do as good a job and do it as reasonably as any white man could, he didn’t want it. I let him try, and now he does most of our printing.’

 

Out of such points of contact, then, encouraged by such wise leaders as Booker T. Washington, will grow an ever finer and finer spirit of association and of common and friendly knowledge. And that will inevitably lead to an extension upon the soundest possible basis of the Negro franchise. I know cases where white men have urged intelligent Negroes to come and cast their ballots, and have stood sponsor for them, out of genuine respect. As a result, to-day, the Negroes who vote in the South are, as a class, men of substance and intelligence, fully equal to the tasks of citizenship.

 

Thus, I have boundless confidence not only in the sense of the white men of the South, but in the innate capability of the Negro, and that once these two come really to know each other, not at sore points of contact, but as common workers for a common country, the question of suffrage will gradually solve itself along the lines of true democracy.

 

Another influence also will tend to change the status of the Negro as a voter. That is the pending break-up of the political solidarity of the South. All the signs point to a political realignment upon new issues in this country, both South and North.

Old party names may even pass away. And that break-up, with the attendant struggle for votes, is certain to bring into politics thousands of Negroes and white men now disfranchised. The result of a real division on live issues has been shown in many local contests in the South, as in the fight against the saloons, when every qualified Negro voter, and every Negro who could qualify, was eagerly pushed forward by one side or the other. With such a division on new issues the Negro will tend to exercise more and more political power, dividing, not on the color line, but on the principles at stake.

 

Thus in spite of the difficulties which now confront the Negro, I cannot but look upon the situation in a spirit of optimism. I think sometimes we are tempted to set a higher value upon the ritual of a belief than upon the spirit which underlies it. The ballot is not democracy: it is merely the symbol or ritual of democracy, and it may be full of passionate social, yes, even religious significance, or it may be a mere empty and dangerous formalism. What we should look to, then, primarily, is not the shadow, but the substance of democracy in this country. Nor must we look for results too swiftly; our progress toward democracy is slow of growth and needs to be cultivated with patience and watered with faith.

BIBLIOGRAPHY OF SOURCES

–––––––—

SOJOURNER TRUTH, THE LIBYAN SIBYL

by Harriet Beecher Stowe

Atlantic Monthly 11 (April 1863): 473-481.

RECONSTRUCTION

by Frederick Douglass

Atlantic Monthly 18 (1866): 761-765.

 

AN APPEAL TO CONGRESS FOR IMPARTIAL SUFFRAGE

by Frederick Douglas

Atlantic Monthly 19 (Jan. 1867): 112-117.

THE NEGRO EXODUS

by James B. Runnion

Atlantic Monthly 44 (1879): 222-230.

MY ESCAPE FROM SLAVERY

by Frederick Douglass

The Century Illustrated Magazine 23, n.s. 1 (Nov. 1881): 125-131.

THE GOOPHERED GRAPEVINE

by Charles W. Chesnutt

Atlantic Monthly 60 (Aug. 1887): 254-260.

 

PO’ SANDY

by Charles W. Chesnutt

Atlantic Monthly 61 (1888): 605-611.

 

DAVE’S NECKLISS

by Charles W. Chesnutt

Atlantic Monthly 64 (1889): 500-08.

THE AWAKENING OF THE NEGRO

by Booker T. Washington

Atlantic Monthly 78 (1896): 322-328.

 

THE STORY OF UNCLE TOM’S CABIN

by Charles Dudley Warner

Atlantic Monthly 78 (1896): 311-321.

STRIVINGS OF THE NEGRO PEOPLE

by W. E. Burghardt Du Bois

Atlantic Monthly 80 (1897): 194-198.

THE WIFE OF HIS YOUTH

by Charles W. Chesnutt

Atlantic Monthly 82 (1898): 55-61.

1 ... 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72
Go to page:

Free e-book «Martin Luther King Jr. Day Anthology - - (comprehension books .TXT) 📗» - read online now

Comments (0)

There are no comments yet. You can be the first!
Add a comment