Non vowel resources of some good mood - Alexander Borodin (most read book in the world .txt) 📗

exposing his former leadership of something illegal, but it’s true that the leadership does not always succeed in denying everything and evading responsibility, because if there are facts and evidence of their accomplishment If this happens, then the answer will still be for it.

I watched the dialogue, how someone wants to convince someone of something, as a result of observation I heard how one person taught another - if someone tries to impose their point of view, we can say: “Who are you, that everyone owes you to listen, and at the same time accept everything that you say as truth? ”

Lyrics: at some time a video appeared on the Internet that was considered popular among some, in this video a well-groomed millionaire (they say he is a millionaire), who is about 50 years old, was dancing in his underwear on a yacht with a girl who looks about 25 years old and who was in a swimsuit. An approximate commentary that was made on this video, against the background of other comments that had the character of admiration for the behavior of a millionaire: “A person leading a parasitic lifestyle that has not worked out, since he has not worked anywhere, dances on the“ bones ”of workers who built for him, a yacht, and next to it is "erratic", which thinks that she will get something if she dances - this is the objective reality of what is happening on the video. " Who does not agree, because we are looking for objective reality in everything? Well, this, of course, is someone’s emotions, and nothing more, a millionaire himself can earn everything that he has, and therefore he can definitely spend what he didn’t earn or earned, but his ancestors, who also didn’t have everything.

“There is no hazing - whoever is weak, they beat him,” - the words of the unfamiliar grandfather to the unfamiliar grandmother at the intercity bus stop, uttered by him when he saw me in soldier uniform. So at work there is no stress - only some have it, like bullying, in relation to some that existed at some times, is it only in relation to some? What is weakness in the sense that is considered throughout this material - is it an inability to respond to aggression, or something that is difficult or even impossible to do without, or something else? Remember that emotional mentors teach you not to hold back emotions? Envy is a form of aggression - do not only envy alcoholics and losers? Some rich people, knowing the psyche of the layman, mimic the environment, "mowing" under alcoholics or losers - they are not envied? Is progress progressing in everything, is it lagging behind only in the psyche, or is the psyche lagging behind it - is this the majority of mental problems? As already indicated, a person is designed in such a way that he can’t just eat, sleep and satisfy sexual instincts, he is also the embodiment of various ideas, therefore, is he not comfortable in a psychological sense? Few can afford to be those from whom there is no harm, but who also does not benefit? In life, you need to prepare for at least one (maybe more, depending on the case and which way of life you lead) emergency situation (for example, when you are attacked on the street), for this you need to learn how to use at least a gas spray?

It is necessary to respond to any manifestation of aggression only in a legal way or in a way not prohibited by law, so as not to harm yourself. As, for example, the rules of the road are taught - if there is no prohibitory stop or parking sign, then it’s allowed, and you need to drop all thoughts that the law does not work, but only what is called “Reshalov” and nepotism. If you live in a civilized state, it means that everything works, “ resolutely preoccupied ” (this usually applies to officials) in a civilized society can only harm yourself, if something like that exists, then only within the city where they are located somewhere further than in this city, this should not be, in the sense that their influence in another city ends, and even further - in the capital of the state - is generally excluded (in the sense that communications, for example, of officials from the periphery break off when it comes to the capital, for officials from the capital they are nobody, so in almost any state).

What can be answered to the one who retells gossip about you, referring to the fact that he heard them from someone - the one who told you this has a good sense of humor, and he is a great joker. You can give another example, though somewhat remote from the topic, when you can "turn" in your favor, take the initiative in your own hands: he served as a soldier in the army, only drafted into the army, his "grandfathers", that is, old-timers, being in dismissal, went around his hometown (and he served not far from him), "grandfathers" were from another region. They meet these “grandfathers” in this city of guys, met, probably even drank alcohol together, or maybe they drank it separately before the meeting, however, it does not really matter, and these “grandfathers” talk about the service to the locals. In the process of communication, it turned out that they were served by a friend of the locals, the locals asked non-local "grandfathers" how our friend was being served, and they said that their friend was rushing around, he was also a "dushar", counting on the fact that, as usual, the locals will join in the gossip of the “grandfathers”, pick them up and begin to assent to them, however, the “grandfathers” had an unforeseen situation - the locals started beating them because their friend was “rushing around” of their own free will. Here's an interesting situation.

Is false evidence admissible with respect to facts that cannot be verified? What to do when what is called an insult has happened against you, and there is no point in writing a statement to law enforcement agencies, since there is no evidence of what happened?

For example, how can you turn everything upside down, the first case: you lied that you were at someone’s house, they checked you by calling the person you supposedly was visiting, he says that you really he didn’t have what to do? We can say that that person simply does not want to say that you had it, the main thing is to remember that everything can be interpreted in a way that is beneficial for you, and not to forget how one person said that if you decided to lie, then you should lie like that so that what you composed cannot be checked later, and who knows whether you are doing good or bad from a moral point of view when you tell a lie (morality, shame, conscience, as some say, the leaders came up with (obviously these were not the words that the workers to manage leaders) to make management more convenient yat those who supervise), because there is such a thing as a lie for the good, and includes a phrase like, "I tell you the truth so that the worst of all lies."

Case two: for example, you are an employee, gossip gossip told your colleagues about you. Here you can answer the following: yes, guys, or yes, girls, I know who told you this about me, but he apologized to me (although in fact there were no apologies from anyone, and the one who told gossip about you don’t know), apologizing, said that he specially composed it in order to gain confidence in you, to attract you to himself, tossed, so to speak, a topic, and he himself solved his questions with the help of you, he just used you.

Attention, this is an affirmative sentence: the following is not a guide to action, it’s just a quote from the author of several models of behavior in various situations that were recorded when people unfamiliar with the author used them and which are not entirely acceptable, since choosing such a line of behavior can endanger yourself physical impact from emotionally-minded individuals.

Lyrics: from older comrades, after you irritated them for some reason, you can hear the following: “You are a puppy”. It seems that you can lower your head or, without lowering it, swallow a grudge and leave, give pleasure to a person - this is also a good option when you are not emotional and you are not touched, as they say, someone has a soul, well, if for you it will be stressful if you don’t answer anything to the person who is naughty to you. The answer in this case to an elderly boor from a person unfamiliar to the author was: “But you have lived your life, but you haven’t gained your mind.” In no case do you need to resort to physical force, otherwise, if law enforcement officers intervene in the matter, you will lose, if you are drunk, then you have already lost a priori. Remember the formula: for all structures, if drunk, then it is to blame. If there is a mutual conflict, then the one who will be drunk will lose it, even though he will be right. Why do you need stress if you love yourself? And stress reduces life, in this situation for a week, probably for sure, and maybe for a month. In the clinic I saw the result of analytical studies in the form of a table, which segment of life takes this or that negative situation.

Lyrics. Two law enforcement officers in uniform approach one of my friends with a request to present documents, and he says to them: “Look for the enemies of the people, they are there.” He pointed to the office building.

The main thing is to be careful when resorting to measures such as answering rudeness to someone, you don’t always know what the person with whom you have an unfriendly relationship is capable of, will he suddenly decide to resort to arguments of physical strength or get a weapon? Therefore, ideally, of course, it’s better not to react to anyone’s provocations (and even if it’s not stress for you, then everything is super), because even large leaders in many countries are criticized, and they are forced to ignore it, or maybe , and not out of compulsion, they simply do not pay attention to any negativity, they perceive everything as production costs, as politicians say , there are no eternal enemies and eternal friends, there are eternal interests.

Many people advise you not to listen to anyone, and this is true, partially true, you need to listen, because you have ears for this, because you look because you have eyes and you can’t look at anyone. Another thing is how to listen and watch, as they say, not "bursting out" perceiving everything seen and said for the truth. You can say this phrase: “For me, what Fedya or Vitya said is not true . ” Everything needs to be treated critically, criticism is a kind of filter, because, as they say, everything (it’s not necessary, of course, to generalize, not all, but the majority) “row by itself” and think how to use someone to satisfy their interests. The risk of what is called manipulation is especially great in relation to the young (not to all, of course, to those who have not yet found themselves in life, like some of their peers), who are considered the most motivated part of society and who are easy to manipulate, since as a rule, their emotional thinking dominates the logical one, it is easier to push them to commit illogical acts with the help of pathetics, because young people love something so global.

You will not become a scientist, or a good software engineer, or an astronaut, because you are worried that you scratched new shoes, or because you do not like your appearance - are there many distracting factors that prevent you from focusing on your studies? Programmers and astronauts are those who have zero or almost zero animal component (sex drive, fear, aggression and other emotions) - are they not emotional or do they have the least emotions? What prevents some professions from gaining and what time is wasted if there are psychological components of