Non vowel resources of some good mood - Alexander Borodin (most read book in the world .txt) 📗
- Author: Alexander Borodin
Book online «Non vowel resources of some good mood - Alexander Borodin (most read book in the world .txt) 📗». Author Alexander Borodin
“To live means to weave a canvas of history from the very beginning, about which no one already remembers anything, and until the very end, about which no one else knows anything,” - quote from the movie “Genesis” (France, Italy, 2004, directors Claude Nuridzani, Marie Peneru).
The modern official psychology of any country is sometimes politicized and commercialized, which is why each person weaves his own canvas of psychology throughout his life, and it is it that is the most objective and suitable for a comfortable psychological state of each individual.
Each psychologist to himself is the basic concept of this work, each should have his own psychology, created on the basis of personal life experience, like an army charter, which, as they say, is written in blood, and no cabinet psychology as the basis for any life steps, only personal psychology, your personal life experience or the experience of friends and relatives who will not be afraid that they will be taken away a psychologist’s license for “wrong” advice, since they don’t have it.
Therefore, the author once again urges everyone to convey their life experience to those who need it, by writing their own work or communication. With his information, he will help others in life and can even save someone. Indeed, over time, each person gains great experience in a certain area of interest to others. Therefore, write books about your life path - help other people with your information. Let the work be even what is called a piece of goods - from the category of someone likes, someone does not - there is such a thing as, for example, non-profit music, and it is also in demand.
Of course, you will encounter difficulties in publishing them, since it is unlikely that any publication will agree to publish free books if you are not a celebrity. Publish for your own money in a small edition, promote it on the Internet in electronic form. There is enough information on the Internet how to promote your work.
If someone still decides to try to publish at the expense of the publication, then the publishers will be interested in who you are and what you mean, if you have the moral right to write what you write about, and not only the moral law will be of interest to the publishing house, but whether there will be profit from the printed work or not. Such questions are asked in order to learn how to advertise your book, that is, in other words, you must be a specialist in some area. Suppose you are writing a work on psychology, then you must know life, and if you need to know it, then where did the information come from, where did you go, except for the school and your apartment? For example, you can call it an obsession, but in some cases the author of this work did not always happen spontaneously - the goal was, as previously indicated, to visit the maximum number of different places and situations, this was done in order to have something to tell about. By the way, with the statement that it is better to be the first, and not the second, at any job, everything is absolutely true: you need to look for a job where you will be first, that is, to search by vocation, and that’s why - you don’t you will feel on equal terms with those with whom you work, if they, as they say, are stronger than you in spirit (if you, for example, serve in law enforcement agencies) or know more than you (if you, for example, became a programmer, but this is not your). In a word, write your personal psychology, you are a psychologist yourself, if you have your own life experience. Print and distribute your works, indicating how and where you acquired your knowledge, help people if not financially, then with information, because the one who is called happy is different from the one who is considered unhappy, in most cases, only by having the right information. As the cricket said to the wooden boy Pinocchio, the character of the film “The Adventures of Pinocchio” (USSR, 1975, directed by Leonid Nechaev), when he did not obey Papa Carlo: “Terrible adventures await you”. And this is because Pinocchio did not have the necessary information to adopt the correct algorithm of actions, but the old cricket saw and understood all this.
A manual on non-theoretical (non-cabinet) psychology - can one dwell on such a characteristic of the work “Secret resources of a good mood of some”? You can also add that it is based on the life experience of people who are not psychologists by education, and therefore a person with life experience will more likely be called not a psychologist, but a specialist in realizing his needs and interests, than he can share with others, and if they needs and interests coincide, so everything is fine.
In one of the documentaries about US correctional facilities, which, if not mistaken, is in charge of the US correction department, it is shown that a psychologist teaches prisoners to suppress aggression, again a dissonance - they, psychologists, say that emotions need to be suppressed, but here it is vice versa. But modern psychologists say to those who are not in prisons about the restraint of emotions, but what is meant by the restraint of emotions and how to do it without breaking the law, that’s the question.
The result is that psychologists are taught in US prisons to suppress aggression, psychologists in freedom say that emotions should not be restrained, since suppressing them is harmful to health and ultimately leads to inappropriate behavior (and aggression is also an emotion, also the concept of internal aggression when a person resorts to suicide).
Conclusion - if restraining emotions is harmful to health, then aggression must be released, but released without breaking the law, and this is what a significant part of the material is devoted to. But then again - is it worth it to be offended by the one who delivered what is called trouble? After all, everything is relative, and what is called failure can be a guardian angel if you don’t know how the fate of the person who suffered the failure would have developed if it hadn’t existed — that’s how it is multifaceted. You were beaten on the street - this is a failure, but if this did not happen, you could have crossed the road at that time, on which a drunk driver or not drunk would drive a car and who could knock you down if the beaters did not detain you for several minutes until the drunk passes by - one failure saved from more serious consequences, this was also mentioned in the work.
Is a citizen interested in the state as a taxpayer, as a producer, as a consumer, as a voter and, if necessary, as a military - a cycle in nature, why is the state interested in ensuring that its citizens are healthy? They say that in 1997, citizens of South Korea voluntarily handed over personal gold to their state in order to solve the economic problems of their country?
Back to global again. No matter how trivial it sounds, one should not forget about social responsibility, because everyone depends on everyone, everyone consumes the fruits of someone’s activity, and therefore everyone needs help. The main thing is the desire for stability, and only in legal ways, otherwise it will already be destabilization and the creation of even greater problems for oneself and others?
Currently, while science is not yet at a level where machines will do everything for a person, people in most cases should do something and help each other, if no one will produce anything, money will lose its value, and civilization will end , therefore, it is acceptable to create something creative, because destructive and so much has already been created, and in this direction, the omega point has probably already been reached. And in this case, you need to help someone who, besides you, has no one else to help, in any case, help with information. Who to relate to someone who, apart from you, has no one else to help - has already been indicated in this material.
Once again briefly about the issues addressed in the work: repetition is the mother of learning. Is there discrimination against those who are dominated by the emotional (animal) over the rational (human) or no one infringes anyone, you can go into the forest and live there according to the laws of the jungle, because only rational gives birth to civilization?
- “Patsaki” seized power on your planet, and on our “chatlan” - exemplary words of one of the main characters of the film “Kin-dza-dza” (USSR, 1987, director Georgy Danelia), played by Evgeny Leonov.
Lyrics: some do not understand why some suffer from a lack of sex life, others do not. The answer is obvious - one needs it, the other does not, non-temperamental people rule the temperamental, and therefore the latter suffer because they do not have a policy of restraining their needs, or more non-temperamental than temperamental?
There is geopolitics, and why not geopsychology? We have no secrets from civilized people living in civilized countries? Does the human lifespan depend on the psychological attitudes of a person? When you write a book, you need to ensure that all phrases have legal inviolability, so that then there are no problems in court? Political correctness everywhere - not homosexual, but gay, not a fool, but a person who is not suitable for you, not a psychopath, but a person with a mobile psyche, etc.? If youth knew, if old age could - does this saying prove that information is important for psychological comfort? Can psychologists, psychiatrists, coaches, writers, motivational speakers and generally any information announced by someone solve the issue of psychological discomfort or is it all empty and psychological comfort can only be provided by material wealth or is it just that empty - in rich countries do everyone feel comfortable? Anything that causes psychological discomfort for you and / or others is considered a mental disorder? Does the economic situation and standard of living affect crime rates? Some TV programs of poor countries show how “spoiled” children from poor families are sent for several days, for example, to a military school or other institutions with strict discipline - a strange method of socialization. And what to do with the same children from rich countries or they are already socialized, and their future is not in danger - they do not need to change to make it easier to survive, they have everything to maintain their "spoiled" lifestyle, and any attempts to impose on the child strict discipline does not entail his parents not encouraging the authorities, but, on the contrary, censure in the form of isolation of the child by the authorities from the family - in rich countries the child will survive
Comments (0)