Human Imperfection - Teboho Kibe (read novels website TXT) 📗

procrastinate it. The same applies to acts of mercy or display of goodness, it is often best and quite apt to execute such without any second thoughts or the proliferation of it. Just let it out as normal, and avoid needless delay, unless however it may be of good cause or purpose to delay it at times, as in rewarding someone at the proper time, allowing others to first think rather than quickly spoon-feeding them thereby promoting laziness and so forth. I know the are other examples you also may be thinking of that completes portion or angle of the puzzle. Thanks for thinking together with me as we both try to touch base with our fundamental issue of the whole scenario of human imperfection and its diverse elements it encompasses.

 

Right, now is the time to ask this obvious question: Does the whole story of the two worlds only apply to mentally stable people? Well, I’m not sure if governments arrests serious psychotics, maybe the correctional departments have psychologist that are able to assess and confirm the level of retardation the convicted ‘mentally ailing’ offender may have. So, as to confirmed and serious mentally handicapped people, their vice or vices may be acquitted. But again note the interesting transverse ‘rule’: The good acts of mentally disabled persons are noted regardless of whether they initiated the execution or not. So, while their vices may go unpunished, their good deeds surely and naturally seem to be what was actually desired of them. But as for biologically sane individuals, surely there’s no grey area for their dealings or conduct. Okay, shall we move on now? Oh yes!

 

Now, do I need any external boost to help me produce fine fruits, or is all execution entirely dependent on me as solo? Ah, well, what a nice question. Again lets attach an illustration to help elucidate an amicable and apt answer. Well suppose you are driving in a completely new territory. For you to safely reach your intended destination, would you hesitate to ask any prospective passerby or at more reliable filling stations? Surely you would undoubtedly do so! So external help is not objectionable to anyone seeking lasting good results from his/her intended plan of action. Now that I discovered my second world through the early smiles and laughter of infancy, where it began, remember that there has to be an external stimulus to generate a smile and a good laugh. So, yes, an external boost or support may be needed to bring out the best from your second world, that of goodness.

 

Right, now I know you’ll be quick to ask me this question: Does it really matter where I get the so called external support that may be necessary to bring out the best of me? Okay, I don’t want to rush now, I sometimes deliberately leave other questions unattended to so that they may exquisitely beautify the puzzle at it crucial body or ending, otherwise you’ll be like an infant trying to chew peanuts. But as for now just rest assured that it does matter, just like how it matters to know on which direction of the compass you fall under. But please as for now don’t ask me where that external support should come from. The point is, it deserves to be found and used to help further boost your level of self worth and contentment in the accomplishing of good! Hence moral ego!

 

Okay, shall we move on? Most certainly! Someone may ask: If it weren’t of those to whom we may be accountable to because of our actions, would it really matter how we use our two worlds, besides those who seem to be exempt from punishment or accountability as in the case of the mentally infirm? Well, this question is yet another redundancy! If we all carefully read between the lines we surely have found an answer by now. Shoo! My friend, it’s not about trying to omit or do away with the so called judges, its about you not hurting yourself, cause at the end of the day it’s you who’ll suffer a premature death due to failure to proper execution, not the ‘judges’! Instead we ought to thank their presence or supervision since it seems to serve for the benefit us, for us to fear and combat evil and try to practice good! Shoo! I hope this doesn’t scare or put anyone in a tight corner. Why would anyone fear or become skeptical of light? Note, light may be there to help one see clearly but it itself is by no acting or executing anything on your behalf. At the end of the day, it is you who decides, and to your cheer you may that that external element that helped you see clearly or come to a right decision. So is the presence of the law, or ‘judges’ to whom we are accountable.

 

Okay, now I hear someone out there asking me this cynical question or coming with this senseless argument: “ My friend, just don’t stress about the two worlds so far, instead of trying to please the so called judges of our actions, why not just end it all in suicide and leave the judges and their claimed ‘light’ to ponder or be confounded about your destiny, now that you’ve abruptly chose to disappear from their ‘claimed’ supervision?” Well, well, well! You must be a hit and run car to think along those lines. Detectives can trace such a car and later impose penalties on such an offender. Ask yourself, what are you trying to run away from? Who gave you the life that you now have? Are you taking away what was started by you or are you knocking your life to death just like that hit and run car? Surely you don’t want to be this irresponsible. Remember that the government may somehow choose to detain or retain the body of an offender who committed suicide while under trial or who was found guilty. So your frenzied escape to the task of proper delegation or execution we are all faced with will not free you in anyway, instead you’ll be like a person who’s treating a flu with an atom bomb!

 

Right, what’s next now! Oh sorry, one of my beautiful old friends out there forces me to be somewhat redundant. With what now? Okay, I hear the resounding question of: What if, after maintaining a stable record of sound execution in my life, old age sets in and thereby makes it difficult or no longer possible to accurately use my brain capacity to distinguish between right and wrong? Well, well, well my old friend, sounds like you’re a roadworthy car having a faded number plate or registration number. In haste, someone would classify you under the exempt mentally infirm, but I would consider you to be still roadworthy, and not enigmatic as the confirmed mentally handicapped. So, in your case judgement would be for the better just like how a discerning traffic officer might not disqualify a roadworthy car simply because of a seemingly faded number plate, especially when the restoration capacity is clearly understood on the part of the driver.

 

Okay, now, is this all about questions and interesting answers? Oops! You decide, how do you want us to go on? Mmmh, don’t be bored now, cause a puzzle is never completed by the same pieces. Ok friend, lets move on now, with another swift blow!

 

Fine friends, now let’s to venture into the avenue of the nature of sin. Here we’ll try to answer questions such as, “ Is there a difference in gravity between acts of malefaction?” ; “ Is sin always voluntary or involuntary?” ; “ How wide is the difference between conceptual sin and a materialized one?” Well, the list goes on. However please note that some of the latter questions may have already been somehow touched in the very early pages of this book, making you think or worry about the seemingly needless repetition. You may be somewhat correct if you’ve noticed that cause it really pointless to be fed after you’ve already ingested some sufficing phagosomes. Don’t worry, lets cordially continue to unravel the mystery and to diffuse and disintegrate the enigmatic human imperfection dilemma.

 

Ok, in terms of sin, its basic meaning would be to miss the mark, therefore primarily suggesting an act that was not initially intended to be so by the executer. So, from this primary meaning it may sound as if the ‘vile’ acts of first world already seem to have a natural excusable foundation from which the accompanying accountability or punishment seem to have no complete or utter sound ground on which to claim or execute their judgement due the seeming involuntary nature of the malefaction produced by the homosapien in question. Well, well, well! Mmmh, I may not fully agree with the previous attestation or claim. Why? Well, while it may be true that sin at times may be involuntarily produced even before it is carried out in deed, always there will be that alarm signal that will ring in the back of your mind telling you that you are now being wayward even before your faulty are performed in discernible action. So, if that natural alarm did not work at all, or was not naturally installed, then I would fully agree to any claim that any carried out sin ought to be free from accountability after each act of it being performed. So, it’s what some call or term: ‘the voice of conscience.’ This conscience will always serve as a natural filter, be along, prior or even after your acts of doom are psychologically planned, in process of being performed or even after a fallacious or unwholesome act.

 

Yes there is a difference in gravity of sinful acts. A winter’s sun is not as hot as a summertime’s sun, isn’t it? Some sins may bear a minor scratch, making the offended just to put up with you and not necessarily try to drag you to some heavy atonement . While on the other hand some transgressions may demand you to atone with a serious ransom, your violation may be so gross or intense that it cannot simply be taken lightly like a winter’s sun.

 

Well, as for the difference between a performed and a mentally conceived sin, here we see a real bingo. The trick here is that simply because the sin is not physically discernible, that doesn’t make it non existent or lacking any weight or gravity. Also, just because transgression had eye-witnesses that don’t automatically render it to be weighty or anyway extreme. Let’s elucidate this. Well, most acts of murder spring from jealousy, envy and so forth, i.e. they had their origin from the invisible mental first world, that of badness. Interestingly, in order to curb some acts of transgressions from finally materializing, some governments have introduced lip reading detectives, and many other crime investigation procedures that help detect possible and probable offenders in their malicious schemes or frame networks. Again, why would some governments spend a fortune in such programs if mental or conceptual vices were no big deal or threat in society? Also interesting is the fact that each year many offenders of this sort are convicted and incarcerated on a number of grounds or charges ranging from sedition, attempted fraud and the like.

 

So, now, for a moment let’s try to go back to the issue of the voice from within. Is there any possibility that that internal ‘alarm’ can be faulty in itself, thereby making the process of proper execution or the demonstration of good deeds to be even more complicated? Aha! I like this question. It makes us to begin thinking of new words like ‘trust’ and ‘reliance.’ Well, the basic truth is that inasmuch as a natural speech may be flawed or at times mispronounced by a vey well or good intentioned speaker, the same applies to the voice from within. It is quite clear or ‘audible’