Criminal Psychology - Hans Gross (list of e readers .TXT) 📗

class="calibre3">60 (a) General Study of Variety in Forms of Expression . 288

61 (b) Dialect Forms … … … 293

<SE> 62 (c) Incorrect Forms … … . . 296

TITLE B. DIFFERENTIATING CONDITIONS OF GIVING

TESTIMONY … … . .. 300

Topic I. GENERAL DIFFERENCES … .. 300

(a) Woman … … …300

<SE> 63 1. General Considerations … .. 300

<SE> 64 2. Difference between Man and Women .. 307

 

3. Sexual Peouliaritiea … … 311

65 (a) General … … . 311

<SE> 66 (b) Menatruation … . . 311

67 (c) Pregnancy … … 317

68 (d) Erotic … … 319

~ 69 (e) Submerged Sexual Factors . . 322

4. Particular Feminine Qualities … . 332

70 (a) Intelligenee … … 332

~ 71 1. Conception … . . 333

<SE> 72 2. Judgment … . . 335

73 3. Quarrels with Women … 337

74 (b) Honesty … … 340

75 (c) Love, Hate and Friendship . . 350

 

76 (d) Emotional Disposition and Related

Subjects … . . 359

77 (e) Weakness … … 361

78 (b) Children… … … . 364

<SE> 79 1. General Considerations … . . 364

<SE> 80 2. Chfldren as Witnesses … . . 366

~ 81 3. Juvenile Delinquency … … 369

XX CONTENTS

<SE> 82 (c) Senility … … … . 372

583 (d) Differences in Conception … … 375

<SE> 84 (e) Nature and Nurture … … . 384

<SE> 85 1. The Influence of Nurture … . . 385

<SE> 86 2. The Viewa of the Uneducated … . 388

<SE> 87 3. Onesided Education … … 391

<SE> 88 4. Inclination … … . . 393

<SE> 89 5. Other Differences … … 395

<SE> 90 6. Intelligence and Stupidity . . 398

Topic 2. ISOLATED INFLUENCES … . . 406

<SE> 91 (a) IIabit … … … . . 406

<SE> 92 (b) Heredity … … … . 410

<SE> 93 (c) Prepossession … … … 412

<SE> 94 (d) Imitation and the Crowd… … . 415

 

595 (e) Passion and Emotion … … 416

96 (f) Honor … … … . . 421

|97 (9) Superstition … … … 422

Topic 3. MISTAKES … … … 422

(a) Mistakes of the Senses … … . 422

98 (1) General Considerations … . . 422

99 (2) Optical Illusions … … 427

100 (3) Auditory Illusions … … 493

<SE> 101 (4) Illusions of Touch … … 449

<SE> 102 (5) Illusions of the Sense of Taste … 452

<SE> 103 (6) The Illusiona of the Olfactory Sense . . 453

104 (b) Hallucinations and Illusions … . . 454

105 (c) Imaginative Ideas … … . . 459

(d) Misunderstandings … … . . 467

~ 106 1. Verbal Misunderatandings … . 467

<SE> 107 2. Other Misunderstandings … . 470

(e) The Lie … . 474

<SE> 108 1. General Considerations … . . 474

~ 109 2. The Pathoformic Lie … . . 479

Topic 4. ISOLATED SPECIAL CONDITIONS . . 480

110 (a) Sleep and Dream � … 480

111 (b) Intoxication … … . 484

~ 112 (c) Suggestion … … 491

 

APPENDIX A. BIBLIOGRAPHY, INCLIJDING TEXTS MORE EABILY

 

WITHIN REACH OF ENOEISH READERB . . 493

 

APPENDIX B. WORKS ON PSYCHOLOOY OF GENERAL INTEREST 500

INDEX … … … … . . 503

 

CRIMINAL PSYCHOLOGY.

 

INTRODUCTION.

 

OF all disciplines necessary to the criminal justice in addition to the knowledge of law, the most important are those derived from psychology. For such sciences teach him to know the type of man it is his business to deal with. Now psychological sciences appear in various forms. There is a native psychology, a keenness of vision given in the march of experience, to a few fortunate persons, who see rightly without having learned the laws which determine the course of events, or without being even conscious of them. Of this native psychological power many men show traces, but very few indeed are possessed of as much as criminalists intrinsically require.

In the colleges and pre-professional schools we jurists may acquire a little scientific psychology as a “philosophical propaedeutic,” but we all know how insufficient it is and how little of it endures in the business of life. And we had rather not reckon up the number of criminalists who, seeing this insufficiency, pursue serious psychological investigations.

 

One especial psychological discipline which was apparently created for our sake is the psychology of law, the development of which, in Germany, Volkmar[1] recounts. This science afterward developed, through the instrumentality of Metzger[2] and Platner,[3] as criminal psychology. From the medical point of view especially, Choulant’s collection of the latter’s, “Quaestiones,” is still valuable. Criminal psychology was developed further by Hoffbauer,[4] Grohmann,[5]

 

[1] W. Volkmann v. Volkmar: Lehrbuch der Psychologie (2 vols.). C<o:>then 1875

 

[2] J. Metzger: “Gerichtlich-medizinische Abhandhingen.” K<o:>nigsberg 1803

 

[3] Ernst Platner: Questiones medicinae forensic, tr. German by Hederich [4] J. C. Hoffbauer Die Psychologie in ibren Hauptanwendungen auf die Rechtspflege. Halle 1823.

 

[5] G. A. Grohmann: Ideen zu einer physiognomisehen Anthropologie. Leipzig 1791.

 

<p 2>

Heinroth,[1] Sehaumann,[2] M<u:>nch,[3] Eckartshausen,[4] and others. In Kant’s time the subject was a bone of contention between faculties, Kant representing in the quarrel the philosophic, Metzger, Hoffbauer, and Fries,[5] the medical faculties. Later legal psychology was simply absorbed by psychiatry, and thereby completely subsumed among the medical disciplines, in spite of the fact that Regnault,[6] still later, attempted to recover it for philosophy, as is pointed out in Friedreich’s[7]

well-known textbook (cf. moreover V. Wilbrand’s[8] textbook).

Nowadays, criminal psychology, as represented by Kraus,[9] Krafft-Ebing,[10] Maudsley,[11] Holtzendorff,[12] Lombroso,[13] and others has become a branch of criminal anthropology. It is valued as the doctrine of motives in crime, or, according to Liszt, as the investigation of the psychophysical condition of the criminal. It is thus only a part of the subject indicated by its name.[14] How utterly criminal psychology has become incorporated in criminal anthropology is demonstrated by the works of N<a:>cke,[15] Kurella,[16] Bleuler,[17] Dallemagne,[18] Marro,[19] Ellis,[20]

Baer,[21] Koch,[22] Maschka,[23] Thomson,[24] Ferri,[25] Bonfigli,[26] Corre,[27] etc.

 

[1] Johann Heinroth: Grundzuge der Kriminalpsychologie. Berlin 1833.

 

[2] Schaumann: Ideen zu einer Kriminalpsychologie. Halle 1792.

 

[3] M<u:>nch: <U:>ber den Einfluss der Kriminalpsychologie auf Pin System der Kriminal-Rechts. N<u:>rnberg 1790.

 

[4] Eckartshausen. <U:>ber die Notwendigkeit psychologiseher Kenntnisse bei Beurteilung von Verbreehern. M<u:>nchen, 1791.

 

[5] J. Fries: Handbuch der psychologischer Anthropologie. Jena, 1820.

 

[6] E. Regnault: Das gerichtliche Urteil der <A:>rzte <u:>ber psychologische Zustande.

C<o:>ln, 1830.

 

[7] J. B. Friedreich: System der gerichtlichen Psychologie. Regensburg 1832.

 

[8] Wilbrand: Gerichtliche Psychologie. 1858.

 

[9] Kraus: Die Psychologie des Verbrechens. T<u:>bingen, 1884.

 

[10] v. Krafft-Ebing: Die zweifelhaften Geisteszust<a:>nde. Erlangen 1873.

 

[11] Maudsley: Physiology and Pathology of the Mind.

 

[12] v. Holtzendorff—articles in “Rechtslexikon.”

 

[13] Lombroso: L’uomo delinquente, ete.

 

[14] Asehaffenburg: Articles in Zeitscheift f. d. gesamten Strafreehtwissensehaften, especially in. XX, 201.

 

[15] Dr. P. N<a:>cke: <U:>ber Kriminal Psychologie, in the above-mentioned Zeitschrift, Vol. XVII.

Verbrechen und Wahnsinn beim Weibe. Vienna, Leipsig, 1884.

Moral Insanity: <A:>rztliche Sachverst<a:>ndigen-Zeitung, 1895; Neurologisches Zentralblatt, Nos. 11 and 16. 1896

 

[16] Kurella: Naturgesehichte des Verbreehers. Stuttgart 1893.

 

[17] Blenler: Der geborene Verbrecher. Munchen 1896.

 

[18] Dallemagne. Kriminalanthropologie. Paris 1896.

 

19] Marro: I caratteri dei deliquenti. Turin 1887. I carcerati. Turin 1885.

 

[20] Havelock Ellis: The Criminal. London 1890.

 

[21] A. Baer: Der Verbrecher Leipzig 1893.

 

[22] Koch. Die Frage nach dem geborenen Verbrecher. Ravensberg 1894.

 

[23] Maschka. Elandbuch der Gerichtlichen Medizin (vol. IV). T<u:>bingen 1883.

 

[24] Thomson. Psychologie der Verbrecher.

 

[25] Ferri: Gerichtl. Psychologie. Mailand 1893.

 

[26] Bonfigli: Die Natugeschichte des Verbrechers. Mailand 1892.

 

[27] Corre: Les Criminels. Paris 1889.

 

<p 3>

 

Literally, criminal psychology should be that form of psychology used in dealing with crime; not merely, the psychopathology of criminals, the natural history of the criminal mind. But taken even literally, this is not all the psychology required by the criminalist.

No doubt crime is an objective thing. Cain would actually have slaughtered Abel even if at the time Adam and Eve were already dead. But for us each crime exists only as we perceive it,—as we learn to know it through all those media established for us in criminal procedure. But these media are based upon sense-perception, upon the perception of the judge and his assistants, i. e.: upon witnesses, accused, and experts. Such perceptions must be psychologically validated. The knowledge of the principles of this validation demands again a special department of general psychology—even such a pragmatic applied psychology as will deal with all states of mind that might possibly be involved in the determination and judgment of crime. It is the aim of this book to present such a psychology.

“If we were gods,” writes Plato in the Symposium, “there would be no philosophy”—and if our senses were truer and our sense keener, we should need no psychology. As it is we must strive hard to determine certainly how we see and think; we must understand these processes according to valid laws organized into a system—

otherwise we remain the shuttlecocks of sense, misunderstanding and accident. We must know how all of us,—we ourselves, witnesses, experts, and accused, observe and perceive; we must know how they think,—and how they demonstrate; we must take into account how variously mankind infer and perceive, what mistakes and illusions may ensue; how people recall and bear in mind; how everything varies with age, sex, nature, and cultivation. We must also see clearly what series of influences can prevail to change all those things which would have been different under normal conditions.

Indeed, the largest place in this book will be given to the witness and the judge himself, since we want in fact, from the first to keep in mind the creation of material for our instruction; but the psychology of the criminal must also receive consideration where-ever the issue is not concerned with his so-called psychoses, but with the validation of evidence.

 

Our method will be that fundamental to all psychological investigation, and may be divided into three parts:[1]

 

1. The preparation of a review of psychological phenomena.

 

[1] P. Jessen: Versuch einer wissenschaftlichen Begrundung der Psychologie.

Berlin 1855.

 

<p 4>

 

2. Study of causal relationships.

 

3. Establishment of the principles of psychic activity.

 

The subject-matter will be drawn on the one hand, from that already presented by psychological science, but will be treated throughout from the point of view of the criminal judge, and prepared for his purposes. On the other hand, the material will be drawn from these observations that alone the criminologist at work can make, and on this the principles of psychology will be brought to bear.

 

We shall not espouse either pietism, scepticism, or criticism.

We have merely to consider the individual phenomena, as they may concern the criminalist; to examine them and to establish whatever value the material may have for him; what portions may be of use to him in the interest of discovering the truth; and where the dangers may lurk that menace him. And just as we are aware that the comprehension of the fundamental concepts of the exact sciences is not to be derived from their methodology, so we must keep clearly in mind that the truth which we criminalists have to attain can not be constructed out of the formal correctness of the content presented us. We are in duty bound to render it materially

correct. But that is to be achieved only if we are acquainted with principles of psychology, and know how to make them serve our purposes. For our problem, the oft-quoted epigram of Bailey’s, “The study of physiology is as repugnant to the psychologist as that of