A Handbook of the English Language - Robert Gordon Latham (if you liked this book .txt) 📗
- Author: Robert Gordon Latham
- Performer: -
Book online «A Handbook of the English Language - Robert Gordon Latham (if you liked this book .txt) 📗». Author Robert Gordon Latham
OF CERTAIN COMBINATIONS OF ARTICULATE SOUNDS.
§ 127. Certain combinations of articulate sounds are incapable of being pronounced. The following rule is one that, in the forthcoming pages, will frequently be referred to. Two (or more) mutes, of different degrees of sharpness and flatness, are incapable of coming together in the same syllable. For instance, b, v, d, g, z, &c., being flat, and p, f, t, k, s, &c., being sharp, such combinations as abt, avt, apd, afd, agt, akd, atz, ads, &c., are unpronounceable. Spelt, indeed, they may be; but all attempts at pronunciation end in a change of the combination. In this case either the flat letter is really changed to its sharp equivalent (b to p, d to t, &c.) or vice versâ (p to b, t to d). The combinations abt and agt, to be pronounced, must become either apt or abd, or else akt or agd.
The word mutes in the third sentence of this section must be dwelt on. It is only with the mutes that there is an impossibility of pronouncing the heterogeneous combinations above-mentioned. The liquids and the vowels are flat; but the liquids and vowels, although flat, may be followed by a sharp consonant. If this were not the case, the combinations ap, at, alp, alt, &c., would be unpronounceable.
The semivowels, also, although flat, admit of being followed by a sharp consonant.
§ 128. Unstable combinations.—That certain sounds in combination with others have a tendency to undergo farther changes, may be collected from the observation of our own language, as we find it spoken by those around us, or by ourselves. The diphthong ew is a sample of what may be called an unsteady or unstable combination. There is a natural tendency to change it either into oo or yoo; perhaps also into yew. Hence new is sometimes sounded noo, sometimes nyoo, and sometimes nyew.
§ 129. Effect of the semivowel y on certain letters when they precede it.—Taken by itself the semivowel y, followed by a vowel (ya, yee, yo, you, &c.), forms a stable combination. Not so, however, if it be preceded by a consonant, of the series t or s, as tya, tyo; dya, dyo; sya, syo. There then arises an unstable combination. Sya and syo we pronounce as sha and sho; tya and tyo we pronounce as cha and ja (i.e., tsh, dzh). This we may verify from our pronunciation of words like sure, picture, verdure (shoor, pictshoor, verdzhoor), having previously remarked that the u in those words is not sounded as oo but as yoo. The effect of the semivowel y, taken with the instability of the combination ew, accounts for the tendency to pronounce dew as if written jew.
§ 130. Double consonants rare.—It cannot be too clearly understood that in words like pitted, stabbing, massy, &c., there is no real reduplication of the sounds of t, b, and s, respectively. Between the words pitted (as with the small-pox) and pitied (as being an object of pity) there is a difference in spelling only. In speech the words are identical. The reduplication of the consonant is, in English and the generality of languages, a conventional mode of expressing in writing the shortness or dependence, of the vowel preceding.
§ 131. Real reduplications of consonants, i.e., reduplications of their sound, are, in all languages, extremely rare. In English they occur only under one condition. In compound and derived words, where the original root ends, and the superadded affix begins, with the same letter, there is a reduplication of the sound and not otherwise. In the word soulless, the l is doubled to the ear as well as to the eye; and it is a false pronunciation to call it souless (soless). In the "Deformed Transformed" it is made to rhyme with no less, improperly:—
"Clay, not dead but soulless,
Though no mortal man would choose thee,
An immortal no less
Deigns not to refuse thee."
In the following words, all of which are compounds, we have true specimens of the doubled consonant.
n is doubled in unnatural, innate, oneness. l — soulless, civil-list, palely. k — book-case. t — seaport-town.It must not, however, be concealed, that, in the mouths even of correct speakers, one of the doubled sounds is often dropped.
§ 132. True aspirates rare.—The criticism applied to words like pitted, &c., applies also to words like Philip, thin, thine, &c. There is therein no sound of h. How the so-called aspirates differ from their corresponding lenes has not yet been determined. That it is not by the addition of h is evident. Ph and th are conventional modes of spelling simple single sounds, which might better be expressed by simple single signs.
In our own language the true aspirates, like the true reduplications, are found only in compound words; and there they are often slurred in the pronunciation.
We find p and h in the words haphazard, upholder. — b and h — abhorrent, cub-hunting. — f and h — knife-handle, off hand. — v and h — stave-head. — d and h — adhesive, childhood. — t and h — nuthook. — th and h — withhold. — k and h — inkhorn, bakehouse. — g and h — gig-horse. — s and h — race-horse, falsehood. — z and h — exhibit, exhort. — r and h — perhaps. — l and h — wellhead, foolhardy. — m and h — Amherst. — n and h — unhinge, inherent, unhappy. CHAPTER IV.EUPHONY AND THE PERMUTATION OF LETTERS.
§ 133. 1. Let there be two syllables of which the one ends in m, and the other begins with r, as we have in the syllables num- and -rus of the Latin word numerus.
2. Let an ejection of the intervening letters bring these two syllables into immediate contact, numrus. The m and r form an unstable combination. To remedy this there is a tendency to insert an intervening sound.
In English, the form which the Latin word numerus takes is number; in Spanish, nombre. The b makes no part of the original word, but has been inserted for the sake of euphony; or, to speak more properly, by a euphonic process. The word euphony is derived from εὖ (well), and φώνη (fônæ, a voice).
§ 134. In the words give and gave we have a change of tense expressed by a change of vowel. In the words price and prize a change of meaning is expressed by a change of consonant. In clothe and clad there is a change both of a vowel and of a consonant. In the words to use and a use there is a similar change, although it is not expressed by the spelling. To the ear the verb to use ends in z, although not to the eye. All these are instances of the permutation of letters.
Permutation of Vowels.
a to ĕ, as man, men. a to oo, as stand, stood. a to u, as dare, durst. a to ē, as was, were. ea to o, as speak, spoken. ea = ĕ to ea = ē, as breath, breathe. ee to ĕ, as deep, depth. ea to o, as bear, bore. i to a, as spin, span. i to u, as spin, spun. ī = ei to o, as smite, smote. i = ei to ĭ, as smite, smitten. i to a, as give, gave. i = ei. to a, as rise, raise. ĭ to e, as sit, set. ow to ew, as blow, blew. o to e, as strong, strength. oo to ee, as tooth, teeth. o to i, as top, tip. o to e, as old, elder; tell, told. ŏ to e, as brother, brethren. ō = oo to i, as do, did. o = oo to o = ŭ, as do, done. oo to o, as choose, chose.Permutation of Consonants.
f to v, life, live; calf, calves. þ to ð, breath, to breathe. þ to d, seethe, sod; clothe, clad. d to t, build, built. s to z, use, to use. s to r, was, were; lose, forlorn.In have and had we have the ejection of a sound; in work and wrought, the transposition of one.
Permutation of Combinations.
ie = i to ow, as grind, ground. ow to i = ei, as mouse, mice; cow, kine. ink to augh, as drink, draught. ing to ough, as bring, brought. y (formerly g), ough, as buy, bought. igh = ei to ough, as fight, fought. eek to ough, as seek, sought.It must be noticed that the list above is far from being an exhaustive one. The expression too of the changes undergone has been rendered difficult on account of the imperfection of our orthography. The whole section has been written in illustration of the meaning of the word permutation, rather than for any specific object in grammar.
CHAPTER V.ON THE FORMATION OF SYLLABLES.
§ 135. In respect to the formation of syllables, I am aware of no more than one point that requires any especial consideration.
In certain words, of more than one syllable, it is difficult to say to which syllable an intervening consonant belongs. For instance, does the v in river, and the e in fever, belong to the first or the second syllable? Are the words to be divided thus, ri-ver, fe-ver? or thus, riv-er, feve-r?
The solution of the question lies by no means on the surface.
In the first place, the case is capable of being viewed in two points of view—an etymological and a phonetic one.
That the c and r in become, berhymed, &c., belong to the second syllable, we determine at once by taking the words to pieces; whereby we get the words come and rhymed in an isolated independent form. But this fact, although it settles the point in etymology, leaves it as it was in phonetics; since it in nowise follows, that, because the c in the simple word come is exclusively attached to the letter that succeeds, it is, in the compound word become, exclusively attached to it also.
To the following point of structure in the consonantal sounds the reader's attention is particularly directed.
1. Let the vowel a (as in fate) be sounded.—2. Let it be followed by the consonant p, so as to form the syllable āp. To form the sound of p, it will be found that the lips close on the sound of a, and arrest it.
Comments (0)