The 9/11 Deception and False Flag Terror - Terence Smart (best short novels of all time .TXT) 📗

witnesses who have seen the hijackers at the security and boarding pass checkpoints.

Researcher Jay Kolar, in his article “What We Now Know about the Alleged Hijackers,” published in The Hidden History of 9-11 (edited by Paul Zarembka), points out that then FBI director Robert Mueller has admitted that the case against the “hijackers” would never stand up in a court of law.

The FBI admitted that the IDs used by the perpetrators were high-quality fakes using identities stolen from Arab men. FBI Director Robert Mueller has admitted in public that there is actually no evidence that proves the named 9-11 hijackers were actually on the aircraft.

In an April 19, 2004 speech delivered to the Common wealth Club in San Francisco, Mueller said that the purported hijackers, in his words, “left no paper trial.” The FBI director stated flatly, "In our investigation, we have not uncovered a single piece of paper—either here in the United States or in the treasure trove of information that has turned up in Afghanistan and elsewhere that mentioned any aspect of the Sept. 11 plot." In describing Mueller’s evidence fiasco, Los Angeles Times reporters Erich Lichtblau and Josh Meyer, whose article was reprinted in The Washington Post on April 30 2004, note that: Law enforcement officials say that while they have been able to reconstruct the movements of the hijackers before the attacks all legal except for a few speeding tickets they have found no evidence of their actual plotting of the events of 9/11.

Now think about that for a moment. What Mueller admitted is that despite all the immediate pronouncements of these Arab names and that they all worked for Osama bin Laden, the FBI with all its investigatory powers did not find one single piece of evidence that actually connected these Arab men to the events of 9-11. All the FBI had were fake IDs found in suitcases left conspicuously where they could be found.

Perhaps the biggest problem with the passenger lists that have been released is that the identities of several of the alleged hijackers have changed with no explanation. We also know that several of the people on the FBI’s list were still alive after 9/11 and could not have been part of any possible hijackings. Some names were deleted and others substituted, but even some of the new names belonged to people who turned out to be alive. Kolar reports that at least 10 of the current list of 19 were still alive after 9/11. Two of the alleged hijackers were supposed to have boarded Flight 77, Salem al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Midhhar, and they turned up alive after 9/11.

In his book, Davidsson points out that former Drug Enforcement Agency administrator and former Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Robert Bonner, testified before the 9/11 Commission that he had been handed a sheet containing the names of the 19 probable hijackers by 11 a.m. on 9/11. The problem is that this is well before the U.S. military had even confirmed which planes had been hijacked. Where did he get this list? How could he know the names of the alleged hijackers just 2 hours after the event, even before any investigation?

There are simply no witnesses who can state that any hijackers actually boarded any planes. No ticket takers, no security personnel, no one. In fact, there is no one who makes a credible claim to have seen any of them at boarding gates or security checkpoints either.

Had 19 hijackers boarded four planes, they should each have been caught on camera dozens of times as they moved through the terminals. But they are no videos only one of Mohammed Atta which we know was at Portland Airport.

Flight 175: The list originally contained four names but a fifth, Mohand al-Sheri, was added later. But he turned up alive and living in Saudi Arabia, according to the Saudi embassy in Washington. Hamza al-Gamdi was supposed to have been a hijacker on Flight 175, but his family came forward to state that the photo released did not resemble him although the name and birth date matched.

Flight 93: Another who turned up alive was Saeed al-Ghamdi. He told David Harrison of The Telegraph (U.K. Newspaper) that he was shocked to see his name on the list of hijackers and that he had spent the previous 10 months in Tunis learning to fly an Airbus. According to the BBC, al-Ghamdi had also been interviewed by the London-based Arab newspaper Asharq Al Awsat.

Here’s an excerpt from David Harrison’s Telegraph story entitled: ‘Revealed: The Men with Stolen Identities’: “Their names were flashed around the world as suicide hijackers who carried out the attacks on America. But yesterday four innocent men told how their identities had been stolen. The men, all from Saudi Arabia – spoke of their shock at being mistakenly named by the FBI as suicide terrorists. None of the four was in the United States on September 11 and all are alive in their home country. The Telegraph obtained the first interviews with the men since they learnt that they were on the FBI’s list of hijackers who died in the crashes in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania. All four said they were outraged to be identified as terrorists. One has never been to America and another is a Saudi Airlines pilot who was on a training course in Tunisia at the time of the attacks”.

Another alleged hijacker, Ahmed al-Nami, told Harrison after 9/11 that he was shocked to see his name on the list of hijackers, adding that, “I had never even heard of Pennsylvania.” He stated that he had been working as an administrative supervisor for Saudi Arabian Airlines.

Why would Osama Bin Laden, attempting to cover his tracks, steal the identities of fellow Saudi Arabians? What would be the point? Why go through the trouble of stealing identities that would point back to you. Why not steal Greek identities, or Brazilian identities, or Turkish ones? A much more logical conclusion is that non-Arabs (Mossad) stole these identities as part of a “false flag” operation designed to point the blame at Arabs, and Saudi Arabia in particular.

John Lear's 2008 affidavit supported a lawsuit brought by Dr. Morgan Reynolds challenging the government theory "as to how and why the World Trade Center buildings collapsed on 9/11." Although the lawsuit was dismissed "with prejudice," Lear's affidavit provides striking practical and technical details explaining how difficult it is in practice to steer a passenger plane from cruising altitude of 35,000 ft into a tall city building. Lear believes it "would have been impossible ... for anyone with little or no time in a Boeing 767 ... to have taken over and then flown the aircraft at high speed, then descend to below a thousand feet above sea level and then flown a course to impact the twin towers." He says that even he couldn't do it on his first try.

“Even on a clear day a novice pilot would be wholly incapable of taking control and turning a Boeing 767 towards New York because of his total lack of experience and situational awareness under these conditions. The alleged hijackers were not 'instrument rated' and controlled high altitude flight requires experience in constantly referring to and cross-checking attitude, altitude and speed instruments. Using the distant horizon to fly 'visually' ... is virtually impossible particularly at the cruising speed of the Boeing 767. To propose that an alleged hijacker with limited experience could get a Boeing 767 lined up with a 208 foot wide target and keep it lined up and hold his altitude at exactly 800 feet while being aurally bombarded with the clacker is beyond the realm of possibility. ... At the peak of my proficiency as a pilot I know that I could not have done it on the first pass. And for two alleged hijackers, with limited experience to have hit the twin towers dead center on September 11, 2001 is total fiction. It could not happen." John Lear – 40 years a Pilot

The story that 19 Muslims named by the FBI were responsible for hijacking four airliners and killing themselves in the process simply cannot stand up to examination. In fact we know for a fact that it is false.

The Miracle Passports

In trying to frame Al Qaeda for 9/11 the American government came up with some laughable scenarios. Now this one defies the laws of physics but according to New York police commissioner Bernard Kerik the passport of Satam Al Suqami (he supposedly was one of the hijackers on one of the planes that hit the north tower) survived the fireball in the tower when the plane hit and was picked up by a civilian and handed into the NYPD. Now when the towers collapsed they mostly turned to dust, steel frames turned to dust, toilets and sinks turned to dust and only DNA from about 1000 of the 2996 victims in the twin towers was found but we are supposed to believe that a passport from one of the hijackers survived. What nonsense, does any sensible person believe that? The NYPD police commissioner Bernard Kerik was a crook because in 2007 he was indicted on 16 counts of fraud and conspiracy and failing to report a $250,000 loan from billionaire Israeli tycoon Eitan Wertheimer from when Kerik visited Israel in 2001.

Flight 93 was supposed to have crashed into the ground in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. The FBI claim that they recovered the passports from the wreckage of two of the alleged hijackers Ziad Jarrah and Saeed Al Ghamdi. There was hardly any wreckage that survived from this plane even the steel titanium engines did not survive but the passports did. How come they don’t seem to find any of the passenger passports only the alleged hijackers? This is just pathetic and not believable, at least not by a sane person. Obviously the appearance of these miracle passports is just part of the attempt to frame Al Qaeda and the Muslims for 9/11. It is worth noting that these terrorist passports keep appearing at these false flag incidents such as Charlie Hebdo, Paris and Belgium. It is obvious that these passports are planted there to frame the Muslims or Isis for these atrocities.

Odigo users pre-warned about 9/11

Israeli instant messaging company, Odigo, admitted that two of its employees received instant messages warning of an impending attack 2 hours prior to the first plane hitting. This warning was not passed on to authorities, which could have saved thousands of lives.

Two weeks after 9-11, Alex Diamandis, Odigo's vice president, said, "The messages said something big was going to happen in a certain amount of time, and it did – almost to the minute."

Odigo has a feature on its service that allows the passing on of messages through a search feature based on nationality, such as Israeli. Knowing these two particular Jews were forewarned, it is very likely they passed the message on to other Jews considering that out of the 4000 Israeli Jews believed to work in the world trade centre towers, only 3 died that day. The 4000 was based on an Israeli government figure.

‘There were, in fact, only three Israelis who had been confirmed as dead: two on the planes and another who had been visiting the towers on business and who was identified and buried’, - New York Times, Sept. 22.

Having only one Israeli casualty among the 2,900 dead at the WTC is simply a statistical impossibility.