The Eight Strokes of the Clock - Maurice Leblanc (reading in the dark .TXT) 📗

back to England and that, since then, her sisters, though she had written to tell them that she was coming over, had heard no more of her.

A fresh enquiry was instituted. A postman found the body in the Meudon woods. Miss Williamson’s skull was split down the middle.

I need not describe the public excitement at this stage nor the shudder of horror which passed through the crowd when it read this list, written without a doubt in the murderer’s own hand. What could be more frightful than such a record, kept up to date like a careful tradesman’s ledger:

“On such a day, I killed so-and-so; on such a day so-and-so!”

And the sum total was six dead bodies.

Against all expectation, the experts in handwriting had no difficulty in agreeing and unanimously declared that the writing was “that of a woman, an educated woman, possessing artistic tastes, imagination and an extremely sensitive nature.” The “lady with the hatchet,” as the journalists christened her, was decidedly no ordinary person; and scores of newspaper-articles made a special study of her case, exposing her mental condition and losing themselves in farfetched explanations.

Nevertheless it was the writer of one of these articles, a young journalist whose chance discovery made him the centre of public attention, who supplied the one element of truth and shed upon the darkness the only ray of light that was to penetrate it. In casting about for the meaning of the figures which followed the six names, he had come to ask himself whether those figures did not simply represent the number of the days separating one crime from the next. All that he had to do was to check the dates. He at once found that his theory was correct. Mlle. Vernisset had been carried off one hundred and thirty-two days after Madame Ladoue; Mlle. Covereau one hundred and eighteen days after Honorine Vernisset; and so on.

There was therefore no room for doubt; and the police had no choice but to accept a solution which so precisely fitted the circumstances: the figures corresponded with the intervals. There was no mistake in the records of the lady with the hatchet.

But then one deduction became inevitable. Miss Williamson, the latest victim, had been carried off on the 26th of June last, and her name was followed by the figures 114: was it not to be presumed that a fresh crime would be committed a hundred and fourteen days later, that is to say, on the 18th of October? Was it not probable that the horrible business would be repeated in accordance with the murderer’s secret intentions? Were they not bound to pursue to its logical conclusion the argument which ascribed to the figures⁠—to all the figures, to the last as well as to the others⁠—their value as eventual dates?

Now it was precisely this deduction which was drawn and was being weighed and discussed during the few days that preceded the 18th of October, when logic demanded the performance of yet another act of the abominable tragedy. And it was only natural that, on the morning of that day, Prince Rénine and Hortense, when making an appointment by telephone for the evening, should allude to the newspaper-articles which they had both been reading:

“Look out!” said Rénine, laughing. “If you meet the lady with the hatchet, take the other side of the road!”

“And, if the good lady carries me off, what am I to do?”

“Strew your path with little white pebbles and say, until the very moment when the hatchet flashes in the air, ‘I have nothing to fear; he will save me.’ He is myself⁠ ⁠… and I kiss your hands. Till this evening, my dear.”

That afternoon, Rénine had an appointment with Rose Andrée and Dalbrèque to arrange for their departure for the States.1 Before four and seven o’clock, he bought the different editions of the evening papers. None of them reported an abduction.

At nine o’clock he went to the Gymnase, where he had taken a private box.

At half-past nine, as Hortense had not arrived, he rang her up, though without thought of anxiety. The maid replied that Madame Daniel had not come in yet.

Seized with a sudden fear, Rénine hurried to the furnished flat which Hortense was occupying for the time being, near the Parc Monceau, and questioned the maid, whom he had engaged for her and who was completely devoted to him. The woman said that her mistress had gone out at two o’clock, with a stamped letter in her hand, saying that she was going to the post and that she would come back to dress. This was the last that had been seen of her.

“To whom was the letter addressed?”

“To you, sir. I saw the writing on the envelope: Prince Serge Rénine.”

He waited until midnight, but in vain. Hortense did not return; nor did she return next day.

“Not a word to anyone,” said Rénine to the maid. “Say that your mistress is in the country and that you are going to join her.”

For his own part, he had not a doubt: Hortense’s disappearance was explained by the very fact of the date, the 18th of October. She was the seventh victim of the lady with the hatchet.

“The abduction,” said Rénine to himself, “precedes the blow of the hatchet by a week. I have, therefore, at the present moment, seven full days before me. Let us say six, to avoid any surprise. This is Saturday: Hortense must be set free by midday on Friday; and, to make sure of this, I must know her hiding-place by nine o’clock on Thursday evening at latest.”

Rénine wrote, “Thursday evening, nine o’clock,” in big letters, on a card which he nailed above the mantelpiece in his study. Then at midday on Saturday, the day after the disappearance, he locked himself into the study, after telling his man not to disturb him except for meals and letters.

He spent four days there, almost without moving. He had immediately sent for a set of all the leading newspapers