The Illuminati and the Deception of History - Terence Smart (best contemporary novels .txt) 📗

extensive evidence that explosives were used to destroy three WTC buildings. That evidence included independent scientific laboratory analysis of WTC dust samples showing the presence of high-tech explosives and/or incendiaries; numerous first-hand reports by First Responders of explosions at the WTC on 9/11; expert analysis of seismic evidence that explosions occurred at the WTC towers on 9/11 prior to the airplane impacts and prior to the building collapses; and expert analysis by architects, engineers, and scientists concluding that the rapid onset symmetrical near-free-fall acceleration collapse of three WTC high rise buildings on 9/11 exhibited the key characteristics of controlled demolition.

The Lawyers’ Committee concluded in the petitions that explosive and incendiary devices preplaced at the WTC were detonated causing the complete collapse of the WTC Twin Towers on 9/11 and increasing the tragic loss of life

https://www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org/26-nov-2018-press-release-response-from-doj/

The 9/11 truth movement which is mostly scientists, architects and structural engineers (you know ‘experts’ some of whom are known for having designed steel high rise buildings) and fireman state that the known evidence does not support neither the NIST reports nor the 9/11 Commission Report. They say that the explanation that the government has provided is wrong or a lie, same thing. It is not a conspiracy theory to examine the evidence and to state that the evidence does not support the explanation that has been given.

Below is the link to the full list of many respected and distinguished university professors casting doubt on the official 9/11 story!

https://www.wanttoknow.info/070618professorsquestion911

So already we now have proof that aeroplanes crashing into a building and fires raging for 56 minutes cannot collapse a building. Over 2000 Architects and Structural Engineers say it is physically impossible for jet planes crashing into the Twin Towers to collapse the towers and they even started their own website www.ae911truth.org.

In other words, planting explosives within a building at carefully preselected locations is the ONLY way to bring down a building on to its footprint. Conversely, if a building falls on to its footprint, we can be certain that explosives were planted within it.

But terrorists from Afghanistan would not be able to sneak past building security and stay hidden during the time they would need to plant explosives at carefully preselected locations. Even a domestic terrorist group would not be able to do this. Only those who own the Twin Towers and manage the security at the Towers would be able to do this and we know who that was, right! Larry Silverstein and the Jewish security firm Kroll Associates as mentioned earlier.

Twin Towers Turn to Dust

If a 110 storey building collapsed you would expect to see all the floors stacked up on top of each other at the bottom and each floor was about three feet thick. The pile of rubble should have been at least 15 floors high. No intact floors were found by the Ground Zero workers.

Below a picture of a 4 storey building that had collapsed because of an earthquake. Notice the floors stacked on top of each other. The Twin Towers had 110 floors and not 4.

The two towers had hundreds of offices which had thousands of toilets, sinks, desks, chairs, computers, printers, cabinets etc. New York firefighter Joe Casaliggi said “You have two 110-story office buildings. You don’t find a desk. You don’t find a chair. You don’t find a telephone, a computer. The biggest piece of a telephone I found was half of the keypad and it was about two inches wide”. The entire buildings and its steel columns had turned to powder or dust. How is that physically possible? How can a Plane and fire turn steel to dust, well it can’t can it. The fuel from an aeroplane burns at 1600 degrees and to melt steel the temperature would have to be 2500 degrees.

NY Governor George Pataki described it: “The concrete was pulverized, all of Lower Manhattan, not just this site, from river to river, there was dust, powder and the concrete was just pulverized. And it was finely pulverized, much of it like talcum powder”.

There were about 2750 victims in the Twin Towers but only 300 whole bodies were found. Not only were the buildings turned to dust but so, apparently, were most of the victims. More than eleven hundred of them remain completely unaccounted for.

Ninety thousand tons of concrete, steel and thousands of tons of office furniture, fixtures and equipment are missing from the debris pile at the base of each building. What sort of force could have destroyed all that?

Dr. Judy Wood’s videos and book ‘Where Did the Towers Go’ sets out a lot of evidence sufficient to conclude that an advanced directed energy weapon was used on the World Trade Center (WTC) buildings on 9/11.

Evidence of a directed energy weapon or HAARP/beam weapon technology was applied during collapse of the Twin Towers on 9/11. The collapse of the WTC buildings was not a 'controlled demolition' for the following reasons: The WTC rubble Pile should have been 1/3 the height of the WTC buildings. The 100+ story WTC buildings were about 1 story high when the collapse of the buildings ended. A fireman on one of the news videos said the antenna that had been on the top of WTC Building 1 was on the top of a pile of rubble about one story high. The rubble pile should have been 35 stories if it was a conventional controlled demolition. You can actually see in some of Dr. Judy Wood’s Youtube videos when the Twin Towers were collapsing you could see steel beams turning to dust in mid-air.

If you think directed energy beam weapons don’t exist then you are mistaken. Directed energy refers to weapons that emit focused energy in the form of lasers, microwaves, electromagnetic radiation, radio waves, sound or particle beams. The military has been working on such weapons for decades.

Mary J. Miller, deputy assistant secretary of the Army for Research and Technology, told the House Armed Services Committee's Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities 'I believe we're very close,' when asked how close the Army is to developing offensive and defensive directed-energy weapons.

“I believe we'll have a directed energy pod we can put on a fighter plane very soon”, Air Force General Hawk Carlisle has claimed at the Air Force Association Air & Space conference in a presentation on what he called Fifth-Generation Warfare.

Directed-energy weapons pods could be affixed to aircraft to destroy or disable incoming missiles, drones, and even enemy aircraft at a much lower 'cost per shot' than missiles or even guns, Air Force General Hawk Carlisle suggested.

The front runner for the Air Force system is believed to be called the High-Energy Liquid Laser Area Defense System (HELLADS), and will create a laser small enough to be mounted on a plane, and is expected to be ready for use by 2020.

Paul Shattuck is director and chief engineer for Directed Energy Systems at Lockheed Martin Space Systems Co. He’s been with Lockheed since 1974, with a focus area of the development of beam control technologies for High Power Laser Directed Energy Systems.

Shattuck states “We have also demonstrated air applications for laser weapon systems with our Department Of Defence customers. We developed the beam control system for the Missile Defence Agency’s airborne laser that shot down a boosting ballistic missile in 2010. That system used a megawatt-class chemical laser, but it was a strategic mission in which the target was in front of the aircraft. Air-based laser weapon systems can offer flexibility and precision for self-defence against aircraft, missiles and weapons on the ground. They also have offensive potential, including precision ground attack against defended targets or swarms of attack boats”.

If the possibility of directed energy beam weapons is just coming into the public sphere now then the deep state or secret intelligent agencies have had this capability for a long time.

World Trade Centre Building 7 Demolished

Why did the WT7 building collapse when no plane hit it? It did have a few fires but these could not have possibly collapsed the building as we have seen from the paragraph above. If you watch the collapse of this building on Youtube it was obviously a controlled demolition.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnLcUxV1dPo

Below a picture of WTC Building 7 which only had a few fires but collapsed like a controlled demolition at free fall speed at about 5.00 in the afternoon on 9/11.

Jewish owner of the Twin Towers Larry Silverstein stated:

“I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, ‘We’ve had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it’. And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.”

Silverstein’s comment obviously means the WTC 7 building was the result of a controlled demolition. But to prepare a building the size of WTC7 for demolition takes at least 10 days. Are we to believe that Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda wired WTC 7 for demolition? No I don’t think so.

Silverstein Properties won an $861 million award from Industrial Risk Insurers to rebuild on the site of WTC 7. Silverstein Properties’ estimated investment in WTC 7 was $386 million, netting a profit of about $500 million. The word greed comes to mind with the Jewish Silverstein, already collecting 4.5 billion from the insurance company for the terrorist strikes on the Twin Towers.

Danny Jowenko was a world renowned Dutch demolitions expert and he said of Building 7 “It’s a controlled demolition, a team of experts did this, its professional work, without a doubt.” It is one thing for the average person to suggest WTC 7 was a controlled demolition, but for a demolitions expert to say that is entirely another thing. Danny Jowenko died in a suspicious car crash in 2011 on a quiet road in Serooskerke, The Netherlands. His car supposedly hit a tree but there was no skid marks on the road and his dog was in his car but didn’t die. Dr. Alan Sabrosky, said in a radio interview in 2010, that his scepticism of the official 911 story was prompted by Jowenko's testimony. Jowenko's death comes three days after Sabrosky gave an exclusive interview to PressTV in which he again reiterated his belief.

Dr J. Leroy Hulsey, Chair of the university’s Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at Alaska University, said: ‘Fire did not and could not have caused the failure of Building 7”. His team has wrote a report about WT7 and the link to this report is below.

http://www.kaltura.com/index.php/extwidget/preview/partner_id/1909371/uiconf_id/36832722/entry_id/0_rxmrybkv/embed/auto?&flashvars[streamerType]=auto

In “Fire Inside: Structural Design with Fire Safety in Mind,” by Carolyn Berry in the August 25, 2007 issue of SCIENCE NEWS, Allen Hay, chief fire safety officer of the New York City Fire Department said concerning World Trade Centre 7: “We just expected it to burn out — we didn’t expect it to fall down.” “It’s the only building I know of in New York City to ever collapse (strictly) from fire.”

The BBC TV managed to announce to a world audience that Building 7 had collapsed twenty minutes before it happened. Reporter Jane Standley makes the announcement that WT7 has collapsed 20 minutes before it actually collapsed and you can see WT7 in the background behind her. The Rothschild owned Reuters gave this news to the BBC a bit too early, maybe it was the time difference between Britain and America.

The video that shows this is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltP2t9nq9fI.

Edward Griffin (Author) stated: “We are led to believe that for the first time in the known universe, a steel-framed, high-rise building was brought down by fire without the aid of explosives or incendiaries. More clearly miraculous was the precise way in which WTC7 collapsed [straight down, with an almost perfectly horizontal roofline] into its own footprint. This is the kind of free-fall implosion that can only be caused by a world-class demolition company”.

“I was one of the first medical search and rescue teams called to the disaster. My life, as this countries changed forever that day. What the public was told and what was shown on the news are two very different things. I took pictures, and have a jacket that still has dust on it. My house was robbed days after I got back home. Not only all my jewellery but my guns and 9-11 pictures and my jacket with the dust all over it within a ziplock bag were stolen. Now, who would want that stuff? I can tell you things that happened that will really blow your mind. Building 7, rescue workers were told to back out before it came down... they knew that building was coming down, it was done by professionals. Anyone who can't see that, they are suffering from Cognitive Dissonance. 17 years later, I am still scared to say too much”. YouTube comment by BobbiCat, part of the search & rescue team during 9/11 from the YouTube video 9/11: What 17 Years of Lies Have Done to us, by Richard Dolan. Richard Michael Dolan is an American historian who specializes in the UFO phenomenon, United