The Illuminati and the Deception of History - Terence Smart (best contemporary novels .txt) 📗

seats, no luggage, nothing that would give me the indication that it was a plane that hit the building. I didn’t have any jet fuel over my body. There was nothing on the inside that would give me any indication that there was a plane on that particular day that hit the building. No one else saw in that area where I was, located saw any parts of any planes or luggage or baggage, or anything of that nature”.

CNN’s correspondent Bob Franken who was at the Pentagon stated, “from my close up inspection there’s no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon” … “the only pieces left that you can see or small enough that you can pick up in your hand’ …“There are no large tail sections, wing sections, a fuselage”

Another eyewitness Don Perkal stated, “A bomb had gone off. I could smell the cordite. I knew explosives had been set off somewhere”.

Below is a photo taken shortly after the apparent crash of Flight 77? Notice there are no signs of debris from a crashed airliner. Notice the perfect condition of the lawn. If a Boeing 757 had hit the Pentagon at almost ground level it would have left gouge marks in the grass for sure, but there are none.

“The government story that they handed us about 9/11 is total BS plain and simple. There was absolutely no possibility that flight 77 could have descended 7,000 ft. in 2 minutes, all the while performing a steep 280 degree banked turn before crashing into the Pentagon’s first floor wall without touching the lawn”, - Captain Russ Wittenberg, U.S Airforce retired commercial pilot, flew for Pan Am and United Airlines for 35 years.

There was no evidence of any wing marks on the building where a 757 measures 126 “10’ from wing to wing. Nor any indications in the upper floors where the tail, which stood 44 feet 6 inches from the ground would have made an impact.

The official story stated that American Flight 77 maintained this trajectory of flying 20 feet above the ground for 3280 feet before hitting the Pentagon, traveling at 530 mph hour. The official report also stated Flight 77 took out five lampposts before hitting the Pentagon. It did this without its wings falling off, ripping off, tumbling out of control, or bursting into flames? This act not only defies the law of aerodynamics but Newton’s third law as well. The wings of many planes have been damaged by a flock of birds in flight. Now, imagine a plane hitting five lamposts and still being able to crash without exploding due to the fuel inside the wings, without tumbling out of control, and still being able to penetrate two thick walls of the Pentagon. This official story would be a great work of fiction, it’s just not reality.

Fred Fox is a former U.S. Navy and a 33-Year commercial pilot for American Airlines. He stated that not even a seasoned American test pilot could have flown a T-category aircraft like the 757 would have flown into the first floor of the Pentagon because of something called, “Ground Effect.” Ground Effect, is the accumulation of pocket of compressed gas beneath the fuselage, which meant that the plane could not even get lower than 60ft to 80ft to the ground, traveling at that speed.

“I challenge any pilot, any pilot anywhere: give him a Boeing 757 and tell him to do 400 knots 20 feet above the ground for half a mile. Can’t do. It’s aerodynamically impossible.” – Nila Sagadevan, pilot and aeronautical engineer.

So who was this super pilot who supposedly flew the 757 Aircraft into the Pentagon? None other than Hani Hanjour who was a poor pilot according to the flight school employees.

Hani Hanjour, who supposedly flew the airliner that crashed into the Pentagon, was reported to the aviation agency in February 2001 after instructors at his flight school in Phoenix had found his piloting skills so shoddy and his grasp of English so inadequate that they questioned whether his pilot's license was genuine. Records show a Hani Hanjour obtained a license in 1999 in Scottsdale, Ariz. Previous and sometimes contradictory reports said he failed in 1996 and 1997 to obtain a license at other schools. 'The staff thought he was a very nice guy, but they didn't think his English was up to level,'' said Marilyn Ladner, a vice president at the Pan Am International Flight Academy, which operated the center in Phoenix. Ms. Ladner said the Phoenix staff never suspected that Mr. Hanjour was a hijacker but feared that his skills were so weak that he could pose a safety hazard if he flew a commercial airliner. A former employee of the school said that the staff initially made good-faith efforts to help Mr. Hanjour and that he received individual instruction for a few days. But he was a poor student. Staff members characterized Mr. Hanjour as polite, meek and very quiet. But most of all, the former employee said, they considered him a very bad pilot.

''I'm still to this day amazed that he could have flown into the Pentagon,'' the former employee said. ''He could not fly at all.''

“I heard a very loud, quick whooshing sound. I was convinced it was a missile. It came in so fast – it sounded nothing like an airplane.” Lon Rains – Editor for Space News (Pentagon eyewitness)

Look at the photo below, You can see the small fire in the centre of the Pentagon but either side of the fire the building is still intact and it would not be intact if a 757 airliner had flew into it. On the inner wall of the Pentagon there is an exit hole were we are told the nose of the plane hit. But how is that possible when there is no entry hole where the plane allegedly entered as the photos show.

The hole in the Pentagon was 65ft yet the wingspan of a 737 was double that. So physically it was not possible.

Below a photo of the Pentagon exit hole. This is the ground-level exit hole on the far exterior wall of the Pentagon's inner ring, some 310 feet away from the impact. It looks like a hole that a missile would make. I believe it was a cruise missile that struck the Pentagon.

Watch the video below, which shows a missile striking the Pentagon.

https://youtu.be/_wjOdhT3Yjg?list=PL_l-j6P3f-wVgMu3XUZU6tsyYDvFXMeaB

The video below was shot from a hotel. It was confiscated by the FBI but then released because of a lawsuit. It shows an explosion at the Pentagon but no plane.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n4O4R0LWCQ4#t=25

Major General Stubblebine said that after investigation (including measuring the impact site with the size of the jet) it couldn’t have been a plane that hit the Pentagon. He concluded it was a missile that smashed into the Pentagon, citing “evidence” that the remnants of a turbine from a rocket were left in the impact zone. He said in the same interview that images that allegedly back up his incredible claims were swiftly removed from the internet and replaced with doctored pictures. Stubblebine supported the idea that the Twin Towers were brought down in a controlled demolition. Albert Newton Stubblebine was commanding general of the U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM) from 1981 to 1984.

“Washington, D.C. is THE most restricted airspace in the world and there are several United States Air Force Bases in the immediate vicinity that enforce the restrictions. There is NO WAY any sort of aircraft could invade the D.C. airspace and actually hit the Pentagon, which is the command center of the U.S. military deployed worldwide. Any incoming “bogey” would be spotted on radar, armed supersonic fighter jets would be scrambled in minutes and that “bogey” would be shot down before being allowed to remain on a course headed for the Nation’s Capital. All of the fighters nationwide should have been airborne, we were already under attack and everybody knew it! The WTC Twin Towers had both been hit! And what was up with the hidden surface to air missile installations that exist in the D.C. area? How did a “bogey” get through them? There was something very fishy about all this!” - Charles Maultsby, American Researcher, Author of ‘Who Should Go Down in History’, www.chuckmaultsby.net

It is also interesting to note that most of the people killed at the Pentagon were budget analysts and accountants who were investigating the 2.3 trillion dollars that had gone missing from the Pentagon funds according to Secretary of Defence at the time of 9/11 Donald Rumsfeld who said this the day before 9/11. The missile that hit the Pentagon actually hit the room were the analysts were investigating the missing billions and killed over 20 of these analysts. Who managed these Pentagon funds at the time, no other than Zionist Jew Dov Zakheim. Were these missing funds used for the whole 9/11 operation by the Zionist Jews?

“Whenever “trillions” go missing from the Pentagon, DOD or any other organ of the U.S. Federal Government, it’s always announced by Jewish comptrollers, accountants or other administrators who have no explanation for the unparalleled grand larcenies. Even those directly responsible for these grand thefts somehow completely escape prosecution or avoid scrutiny from even the IG. In this way, the Jewish banksters have conditioned the American people to accept “missing trillions” as business as usual whenever it concerns US government bookkeeping. This particular type of peacetime plundering and pillaging of the American people represents the largest ongoing heist in world history” – From http://themillenniumreport.com/2019/12/the-hidden-powers-behind-the-destruction-of-america/

The Fake 9/11 Calls?

In the absence of surviving passengers on the flights, this “corroborating evidence”, against the supposed Arab hijackers was based on passengers’ cell and air phone conversations with their loved ones on the ground.

Research by Professor David Ray Griffin sharply questions the authenticity of the calls allegedly made on board the flights. Also Scientist A.K. Dewdney lists several ways that a person’s voice can be mimicked or transformed to the point of fooling people close to the one impersonated. He also describes a telephone facility headquartered in Israel that could have eavesdropped on calls made before 9/11. Professor Griffin details the strong probability that none of the cell phone calls were on the flights and notes the official change of story as to which calls were done by air phones. Air phone calls can be made during a flight at most altitudes, whereas studies have shown cell phones to be highly unreliable, at best, even at low altitudes with the technology available in 2001.

Expert opinion within the wireless telecom industry casts serious doubt on “the findings” of the 9/11 Commission. According to Alexa Graf, a spokesman of AT&T, commenting in the immediate wake of the 9/11 attacks:

“It was almost a fluke that the [9/11] calls reached their destinations… From high altitudes, the call quality is not very good, and most callers will experience drops. Although calls are not reliable, callers can pick up and hold calls for a little while below a certain altitude”

The following is from Professor David Ray Griffin’s article which calls in to question the alleged calls made from the supposedly hijacked planes on 9/11:

‘The most famous of the reported calls were from CNN commentator Barbara Olson to her husband, US Solicitor General Ted Olson. According to CNN, he reported that his wife had “called him twice on a cell phone from American Airlines Flight 77,” saying that “all passengers and flight personnel, including the pilots, were herded to the back of the plane by . . . hijackers [armed with] knives and cardboard cutters.”

Although these reported calls, as summarized by Ted Olson, did not describe the hijackers so as to suggest that they were members of al-Qaeda, such descriptions were supplied by calls from other flights, especially United 93, and from which about a dozen cell phone calls were reportedly received before it crashed in Pennsylvania.

There was, however, a big problem with these reported calls. Given the technology available in 2001, cell phone calls from airliners at altitudes of more than a few thousand feet, especially calls lasting more than a few seconds, were not possible, and yet these calls, some of which reportedly lasted a minute or more, reportedly occurred when the planes were above 30,000 or even 40,000 feet. This problem was explained by some credible people, including scientist A.K. Dewdney, who for many years had written a column for Scientific American.

An even more serious difficulty is presented by the case of Deena Burnett, who said that she had received three to five calls from her husband, Tom Burnett. She knew he was using his cell phone, she reported to the FBI that very day and then to the press and in a book, because she had recognized his cell phone number on her phone’s Caller ID. We cannot suppose her to have been mistaken about this. We also, surely, cannot accuse her of lying.

Therefore, if we accept the FBI’s report, according to which Tom Burnett did not make any cell phone calls from Flight 93, we can only conclude