The Illuminati and the Deception of History - Terence Smart (best contemporary novels .txt) 📗

Professor Jonathan Barnett of Worcester Polytechnic Institute, who analysed a section of steel from WTC 7 and said that fire would not explain steel members in the debris pile that appear to have been partly evaporated in extraordinarily high temperatures. Another source can be attributed to civil engineering professor Abolhassan Astanch-Asl, with the University of California at Berkeley. He spent two weeks at ground zero studying steel from the buildings, one of which was a horizontal I-beam from WTC 7. Professor Astanch-Asl reported that “parts of the flat top of the I beam, once five-eighths of an inch thick, had vaporized.” This phenomenon would require temperatures of 5,182 degrees Fahrenheit.

Temperatures required to melt steel occur around 2,500 degrees F. Jet fuel, which is primarily kerosene, cannot burn much hotter than around 1,500 degrees F. Normal office fires are known to be capable of reaching temperatures of around 1,100 degrees. The Key to understanding how office fires could not have contributed to the collapse of Building 7, is the fact that steel has a terrific capacity as a heat sink. Heat applied to one section will travel and disperse that heat to whatever other steel it is attached to, necessitating many, many hours to achieve temperatures hot enough to even begin to bend steel, let alone melt it. Never in the history of modern architecture, before or after 9/11, has a steel framed skyscraper collapsed due to fire alone. Moreover, video evidence shows only a few small fires still burning at the time of Building 7’s collapse around 5:20 pm on the afternoon of 9/11.

Kurt Sonnenfeld was the FEMA videographer who, for 29 days after 9-11, filmed the crime scene at the World Trade Center, including the sub-basement levels of WTC 6 and 7.

Kurt Sonnenfeld released his book El Perseguido (The Persecuted) on May 8, 2009, at the 35th Annual Buenos Aires Book Fair in Argentina, where he lives in exile since 2003. Sonnenfeld's book tells the history of his persecution at the hands of U.S. authorities over the course of more than seven years after his official mission to Ground Zero as FEMA’s videographer.

Kurt Sonnenfeld gave an interview about WT7 and said: “What happened with Building 7 is incredibly suspicious. I have video that shows how curiously small the rubble pile was, and how the buildings to either side were untouched by Building Seven when it collapsed. It had not been hit by an airplane; it had suffered only minor injuries when the Twin Towers collapsed, and there were only small fires on a couple of floors. There’s no way that building could have imploded the way it did without controlled demolition. Yet the collapse of Building 7 was hardly mentioned by the mainstream media and suspiciously ignored by the 911 Commission”.

If WT7 was a controlled demolition then the government’s version of events on 9/11 was a lie. Maybe WT7 was being used to co-ordinate the events of 9/11 and they had to bring it down to hide the evidence. I will also note that the CIA had offices in the WT7 building. WT7 was also built by one of the owners of the Twin Towers, Larry Silverstein, what a coincidence.

The link below shows the demolition of WTC building 7 from 23 angles.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnLcUxV1dPo&feature=youtu.be

The evidence is irrefutable that the Twin Towers and WTC7 did not collapse by the aeroplanes striking them or the fires and this evidence comes from experts. This all means that the 19 Arab men were innocent and so was Osama Bin Laden. The Rothschild Illuminati Zionists, mostly within America caused this to happen so they could destroy Israel’s enemies Iraq and later Libya and Syria and create a fake ‘war on terror’ and then take peoples freedoms away with the Patriot Act and Department of Homeland Security, both created weeks after 9/11. Plus more surveillance at airports with evasive body searches and new laws being made so they can keep track of every phone call, email, text message, purchase, and web sites visited.

Remote Controlled Planes?

It is highly possible that the two planes that hit the towers were remote-controlled drones, converted to look like commercial jets and then guided into their targets by Israeli Mossad operatives.

If you aren't already aware, both the U.S. and Israeli governments have the capability to take control of commercial airliners by remote, and either fly them off course and land them, or crash them wherever and whenever they wish.

Norad has been able to fly planes remotely for many decades:

NORAD (the North American Air Defense Command) had at its disposal a number of U.S. Air Force General Dynamics F-106 Delta Dart fighter aircraft configured to be remotely flown into combat as early as 1959 under the auspices of a program known as SAGE. These aircraft could be started, taxied, taken off, flown into combat, fight, and return to a landing entirely by remote control, with the only human intervention needed being to fuel and re-arm them.

As Wikipedia explains:

“The Semi-Automatic Ground Environment (SAGE) was an automated control system for tracking and intercepting enemy bomber aircraft used by NORAD from the late 1950s into the 1980s. In later versions, the system could automatically direct aircraft to an interception by sending instructions directly to the aircraft’s autopilot”.

NASA and the FAA flew a plane by remote control in 1984:

In 1984 NASA Dryden Flight Research Center and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) teamed-up in a unique flight experiment called the Controlled Impact Demonstration (CID), to test the impact of a Boeing 720 aircraft using standard fuel with an additive designed to suppress fire.

“On the morning of December 1, 1984, a remotely controlled Boeing 720 transport took off from Edwards Air Force Base (Edwards, California), made a left-hand departure and climbed to an altitude of 2300 feet. It then began a descent-to-landing to a specially prepared runway on the east side of Rogers Dry Lake. Final approach was along the roughly 3.8-degree glide slope”.

Take a look at the article below about the Global Hawk remote controlled aircraft.

“A robot plane has made aviation history by becoming the first unmanned aircraft to fly across the Pacific Ocean. The American high-altitude Global Hawk spy plane made flew cross the ocean to Australia, defense officials confirmed. The Global Hawk, a jet-powered aircraft with a wingspan equivalent to a Boeing 737, flew from Edwards Air Force Base in California and landed late on Monday at the Royal Australian Air Force base at Edinburgh, in South Australia State. The 8600 mile (13840 km) flight, at an altitude of almost 12.5 miles (20 km), took 22 hours and set a world record for the furthest a robotic aircraft has flown between two points. The Global Hawk flies along a pre-programmed flight path, but a pilot monitors the aircraft during its flight via a sensor suite which provides infra-red and visual images. "The aircraft essentially flies itself, right from takeoff, right through to landing, and even taxiing off the runway," said Rod Smith, the Australian Global Hawk manager.

The full article above can be found at: http://itn.co.uk/news/20010424/world/05robotplane.shtm

Below a YouTube video titled ‘Inside 9/11 - Who Controlled the Planes’:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WC9KZ2Yy5g4

Bedek is an Israeli company that specializes in converting aircraft. Its website states it handles ‘heavy maintenance, modifications, upgrades, and conversions all types of commercial and military aircraft’.

Zionist, Israeli citizen and Council on Foreign Relations member Dov Zakheim was the controller of the Pentagons finances from May 2001 to March 2004. On September 10, 2001, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld held a press conference to disclose that over 2 Trillion dollars in Pentagon funds could not be accounted for. Rumsfeld stated: "According to some estimates we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions." Jew Zakheim was also chief executive at System Planning Corporation which is based in Arlington, Virginia, it is a defence contractor specializing in electronic warfare technologies including remote-controlled aircraft systems. So Zakheim’s company made remote control systems for planes, boats, missiles and other vehicles. I believe Zakheim could be one of the major planners of the events of 9/11.

The bulge in the middle underneath the plane that hit the second tower has been identified by Pilotsfor911truth as an AWACS flight controller which is the same technology that Zakheim’s company manufactures.

The American movie The Lone Gunmen (May 2001) showed how this remote technology could work. In this movie they hacked into the remote guidance system of the plane and steered it away from a tall building before it crashed. Guess what the tall building was in the movie? Yes your right the World Trade Centre.

A German documentary alleges Zionist Jew Pete Zalewski was the air traffic controller responsible for 2 of the planes on 911 & another plane full of top Egyptian military officials whose plane EgyptAir F990 crashed 2 years prior to 911. It executed a strange manoeuvre near the coast then sank into the Atlantic killing more than 200 people including over 30 Egyptian military officials. It is believed that the Israelis used their remote control technology on this plane to crash it into the Atlantic as a dress rehearsal for 9/11 when they would use this technology again.

http://newsmine.org/content.php?ol=9-11/911-flight-controller-handled-egypt-air-flight-990.txt

No Plane hit the Pentagon

How could a commercial plane enter the Pentagon’s “no-fly zone” without being seen or not shot down by the Pentagons own surface to air missiles?

Also the Pentagon exploded 30 minutes after the Twin Towers were hit so why wasn’t this so called plane intercepted by F16’s before it reached what was probably the best-defended building in the world? The Pentagon had dozens of CCTV around the building as you would expect and it had SAM (surface to air missile) launchers stationed around the Pentagon. Why were they not used? They were not used because no plane hit the Pentagon, it was an Israeli cruise missile.

About 80 CCTV videos from buildings and businesses around the Pentagon were taken away by the FBI. So if a plane did hit the Pentagon then these videos would show that so why doesn't the government show this proof?  The American government says it is a conspiracy theory to suggest no plane hit the Pentagon but they cannot show us proof that a plane did hit the pentagon so we must assume that they are involved in a cover up. The reason the videos were confiscated was because they would show that no Plane hit the Pentagon.

The American government claims the fire in the Pentagon was so hot that the virtually indestructible titanium engines were melted, enormous metal wings incinerated, detachable vertical tail fins swallowed whole, seats and luggage consumed, every inch of metal framing obliterated, landing gear gone, a whole enormous Boeing 757 essentially vaporized into molten rubble and dust. Yet they were able to extract DNA of 184 individual human beings from the wreckage. What nonsense.

There is NOT ONE piece of wreckage that has been positively tied to Flight 77. The engines, virtually indestructible, were not recovered. There were no bodies, no seats, and no pieces of luggage. There were a couple of pieces of fuselage but they were big enough that one person could pick them up. There’s no proof it came from that plane. There was no damage to the grass, which should have been gouged by the engines dragging on the ground.

Let’s listen to the testimony of an eyewitness who was in the part of the Pentagon that got attacked and lived to tell about it. April Gallup worked on the West Side of the Pentagon. She said:

“I thought it was a bomb. I was buried in the rubble and my first thought was for my son. I crawled around until I found his stroller. It was crumpled all into a ball and I was then very afraid. But then I heard his voice and managed to locate him. Outside they were treating people on the grassy lawn. But all the ambulances had left, so a man, who was near the scene stepped up, put us in his private car, and drove us to the hospital. The Images are burned into my brain”.

Mrs. Gallup escaped out of the exact impact of where supposedly Flight 77 hit and came out onto the lawn.

April Gallup was then visited in hospital by men in suits who basically told her to stick to the plane hit the Pentagon story and to take money. Hmm sounds very suspicious.

Gallup continued:

“They never identified themselves or even said which agency they worked for. But I know they were not newsmen because I learned that the Pentagon had told news reporters not to cover survivors’ stories or they would not get more stories out of there. The men who visited all said they couldn’t tell me what to say; they only wanted to make suggestions. But then they told me what to do, which was take the money (Victim Compensation Fund) and shut up. They also kept insisting that a plane hit the building. But I was there and I never saw a plane or even debris from a plane. I figure the plane story is there to brainwash people”.

Mrs. Gallup states, “I hadn’t seen any evidence of metal, airplane